Woman Put on Probation After Cashing Over $66k in Forged Checks

 

A last-minute plea bargain abruptly ended the trial of 36-year-old Misty Michelle Smith before it even began on Monday, when at 2:45 p.m. the petite blonde confessed her guilt to seven counts of forgery and one count of theft committed from 2009-2011.

Gripping a tissue in her right hand and wiping hear teary eyes, Smith pled guilty to forging company checks from Meadows Fisher and Cleere Insurance Company when she worked there as an employee, in the cumulative amount of $66, 249.89. The theft charge, a second-degree felony, stemmed from her pocketing the cash when the checks had cleared.

“She was an assistant there at the company, and part of her duties were to pay bills and things like that, and so she was writing checks to herself,” 51st Assistant District Attorney Richard Villareal explained.

After admitting guilt in Judge Tom Gossett’s 391st District Court, the judge made clear that she had gotten a good deal and, following the DA’s recommendation, sentenced Smith to 10 years deferred adjudication in all four of her cases. Those sentences will run concurrently. In addition, Smith has been ordered to pay $66,249.89 in restitution before her probation ends.

“Ms. Smith, you’re on deferred adjudication,” Gossett said sternly. “You’re lucky, ma’am.”

The checks Smith forged were from the First National Bank of Sonora, and on the “Pay to the Order of” line, she had typed various dollar amounts in odd and even numbers. On the signature line was the cursive autograph of B.E. Cleere, which had been applied using a fraudulent stamp. Villareal said the stamped signature was one of the things that tipped investigators off that a forgery had occurred.

Cleere said that although Smith had begun forging the checks on Dec. 31, 2008, it wasn’t until 2011 that her forgeries were discovered. “It was my CPA’s secretary who discovered it,” Cleere said Monday. “[She was] using a stamp...and paying her[self] a pretty nice salary.” 

Prior to the discovery of Smith’s fraudulent activities, Cleere said he had no reason to suspect she was engaged in any criminal activity that could be harmful to himself or the company. “I had complete confidence in all of my employees,” he said.

Cleere was present in the courtroom Monday, and said he was “fine” with the outcome and the sentencing.

“As far as I’m concerned, it went by the law and that’s all we can go by,” Cleere said. “I think justice was served.”

Because Cleere is 65 years old or older, Smith’s forgery charges were third-degree rather than state jail felonies. The punishment range on a third-degree felony is 2-10 years and an optional $10,000 fine.

Theft greater than $20k but less than $100k is a third-degree felony, however in Smith’s case the charge was enhanced to a second-degree felony punishable by 2-20 years confinement and an optional $10,000 fine. Should Smith violate the terms of her probation, she could be sentenced to a max of 10 years in the penitentiary for the forgeries and 20 years for the theft.

Misty Smith now resides in Granbury. Andrew Ottaway, also of Granbury, served as her defense counsel.

The jury was dismissed in the case before being seated. Jury selection took three hours Monday morning.

 

 

 

 

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

Wow! She knows how powerful Sonny Cleere is and the connections he has, just like the Standard Times connection. Who else would make such news so fast and widespread; Convicted sex offenders don't make this kind of news! She fought this for 3 years. Taking a plea and saying guilty proves nothing. We know why she took probation. She was not convicted, ready to move on! She is an incredible lady and we stand beside her.She worked for him 10 years and knows how he works.
Pleading guilty actually means alot. It means you're guilty. And yes we all know why she took probation...because she committed a crime and if she would have taken it to trial, she would have been convicted and went to jail. Also, if you look at today's stories, an accused sex offender is one of them. They make the news just like people who have stolen 66K from work.
"Deferred Adjudication" In short, Deferred Adjudication is a type of probation. A defendant is placed on a probation for a certain period of time. If the probation is successfully completed, the case is "dismissed." A defendant will enter a guilty plea, but the judge does not find the defendant guilty and instead "defers" the finding of guilt. Pleading guilty for Deferred Adjudication is not considered a conviction under Texas law. A criminal background check will show the arrest for the charge, will show the Deferred Adjudication, but it will not show a conviction.
If the public only knew the whole story I don't think they'd be so quick to judge. Any good mother would take a plea and say guilty just to stay home with her children instead of taking a chance on being convicted wrongly and sitting in prison. Just another show of small town politics!
jdgt, Fri, 11/21/2014 - 08:50

I SERIOUSLY doubt she was innocent. I can see how theft of this magnitude can take a while to detect... but once it's discovered, it's not like you can just "make up" where it came from. There's a nasty trail of evidence and it leads directly back to the culprit.

She may be a "good mother" but she was a shitty thief :)

Post a comment to this article here: