Gas Prices in San Angelo See Slight Increase Amid Statewide Decline

 

SAN ANGELO, TX — While Texas continues to see a general decline in gas prices, San Angelo motorists are experiencing a slight increase.

According to AAA Texas’ Weekend Gas Watch report for September 12, 2024, the average price for a gallon of regular unleaded fuel in San Angelo rose by 22 cents from the previous week, bringing the current price to $2.90 per gallon. This contrasts with the statewide average, which fell to $2.80—11 cents lower than last week and 58 cents less than the same time last year.

Of the major metropolitan areas surveyed across Texas, drivers in El Paso are paying the most at $3.19 per gallon, while those in Abilene are seeing the lowest prices at $2.59. The national average also continues to trend downward, sitting at $3.24 per gallon, which is 7 cents lower than a week ago and 60 cents less than last year. 

"The statewide gas price average is 18 percent lower when compared to one year ago," said Daniel Armbruster, AAA Texas spokesperson. "Fuel price averages should continue to drop as we go through September."

According to new data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), gas demand fell last week from 8.93 million b/d to 8.47. Meanwhile, total domestic gasoline stocks rose 219.2 to 221.6 million barrels, and gasoline production decreased last week, averaging 9.4 million barrels per day. Tumbling gasoline demand and oil costs will likely keep pump prices sliding, AAA Texas stated. 

AAA Texas

AAA Texas

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

In the midst of escalating gas prices and pervasive economic hardships, it’s tempting to view these issues through a lens of doom and gloom. Yet, if we dare to shift our perspective, we might find that these crises, while severe, could pave the way for unexpected benefits—not just for humanity but for the environment as well. It’s a controversial view, but one that merits consideration: the eventual extinction of our species, driven by these very challenges, might actually result in a healthier planet.

The rising cost of fuel, which has many consumers grumbling and scrambling, is forcing a reckoning. As gasoline becomes increasingly unaffordable, the immediate impact is a reduction in individual car use. This decline in vehicular emissions could, in the short term, offer a glimmer of environmental relief. More broadly, high fuel prices accelerate the transition towards alternative energy sources and greener technologies. This shift is not merely a temporary adjustment; it’s a step towards a sustainable future. However, the ultimate irony lies in the fact that the environmental benefits of these transitions might be overshadowed by the broader implications of economic and ecological collapse.

Economic destitution, while devastating for many, may also inadvertently serve as a catalyst for environmental healing. As economic instability spreads, industrial activities, which are major contributors to pollution and resource depletion, could face significant reductions. Factories might close, production might scale back, and overall consumption could decrease. This unintended slowdown in industrial activity may lead to a temporary but significant reduction in environmental degradation. However, the more profound consequence of these crises could be the eventual collapse of human civilization.

It’s a grim scenario to consider, but the potential environmental benefits of human extinction are worth contemplating. The natural world, which has been increasingly overshadowed by human activities, might begin to recover in the absence of industrial pollution, deforestation, and habitat destruction. Ecosystems could regenerate, wildlife populations might rebound, and natural processes could restore balance to the planet.

The extinction of our species, while tragic, would remove the most significant force driving environmental harm. The reduction in carbon emissions, the cessation of resource exploitation, and the halt of ecological damage would, over time, allow the Earth to heal. Forests could reclaim deforested lands, oceans could recover from pollution, and biodiversity could flourish without the pressures imposed by human activity.

This perspective challenges our conventional views on environmental protection and human survival. It forces us to confront uncomfortable truths about our impact on the planet. In the grand scheme, the extinction of humanity might indeed offer a reprieve for Earth’s ecosystems, allowing them to recover from centuries of exploitation and degradation.

While this view is certainly provocative, it underscores a crucial point: the environmental cost of human activity is immense, and the solutions to these problems may be more complex and multifaceted than we often acknowledge. Rising gas prices and economic hardship, though painful, might be symptoms of a larger, more systemic issue that could ultimately lead to a significant environmental turnaround.

In conclusion, while the prospect of human extinction is a deeply unsettling one, the potential benefits for the environment cannot be ignored. As we grapple with the consequences of our actions and the unfolding crises, it’s important to consider not just the immediate impacts but also the long-term implications for the planet. In a paradoxical way, the hardships we face today might set the stage for a future where Earth can thrive in the absence of its most disruptive inhabitants.

[COMMENT PRODUCED BY AI. DO NOT EVER ATTEMPT TO HOLD ME ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANYTHING IN ANY GIVEN CONTEXT AT ANY TIME OR PLACE.]

Post a comment to this article here: