Brad Goodwin’s yard signs, 4x4 feet and 8x4 feet, violate the Texas Ethics Commission rules said Gus Clemens, who is the media buyer for Carmen Dusek's campaign facing Goodwin for 391st District Judge.
[[{"fid":"17732","view_mode":"preview","type":"media","attributes":{"height":"315","width":"851","class":"media-element file-preview imgbody"}}]]
Above: Brad Goodwin's campaign logo from his Facebook page header. (Facebook)
Such a violation is not a one-time thing, they said. Every single sign is an additional violation of the rules, Clemens argues.
[[{"fid":"17733","view_mode":"preview","type":"media","attributes":{"height":"674","width":"1200","class":"media-element file-preview imgbody"}}]]Above: Carmen Dusek's signage. (Facebook)
The “for” on Goodwin’s signs is 37.5% the size of the office, they allege. This may be nit-picky, but this is election of a judge, Clemens claimed. “Judges must know and follow the law. Goodwin either didn’t look at the rules or deliberately declined to follow them,” Clemens said in a statement.
According to Clemens, this is the corresponding Texas law governing signage that she claims Goodwin in in violation. Emphasis is theirs:
II. Misrepresentation Of Office Title.
A candidate may not represent that he or she holds an office that he or she does not hold at the time of the representation. If you are not the incumbent in the office you are seeking, you must make it clear that you are seeking election rather than reelection by using the word “for” to clarify that you don’t hold that office. The word “for” must be at least one-half the type size as the name of the office and should appear immediately before the name of the office.
In addition to the signs, Clemens claims Goodwin also violated Texas law by announcing his campaign before appointing a treasurer. "Goodwin sent out press releases and began running for office prior to filing a treasurer appointment. You must have a campaign treasurer on file with the Texas Ethics Commission before you can do any campaigning or tell people you are going to run," Dusek claimed. They sent a link to Goodwin's April 24, 2015 announcement.
Stephen McLaughlin of McLaughlin Advertising responded early Tuesday morning after research with the state.
"By the time I was contacted, the story was already on San Angelo Live, and the members of the campaign quoted in it had Facebook posts denying authorship of the statement it was based on.
"My firm designed the logo for Brad Goodwin’s campaign.
"There was, of course, no intent to ignore or defy any of the ethics guidelines. Not on our part, and certainly not on Mr. Goodwin’s.
"The story refers to the election guidelines of the Texas Ethics Commission, not actually Texas LAW. These guidelines are set by the Commission and candidates agree to adhere to them or face a fine.
"At issue is the size of the word "FOR", which the guidelines require to be at least half the size of the name of the office sought by any non-incumbent.
"Our design absolutely meets the intent of the guideline. I do not believe the Commission would find fault with the proportions either. Unfortunately this was not raised until it was too late to get a ruling before the election.
"On Monday I contacted the Commission for clarification on whether the overall words being in proportion was what they required, as we designed the Goodwin logo, or if measuring the highest points of the letters was their criteria. According to their staff attorney there is no precedent for this question. No one has ever filed a complaint about the size of “FOR”.
"He could identify no violation.
"I have every faith that the voters in this election will see that IF this is an error, it was slight, and ONLY on my part. This in no way changes the fact that Brad Goodwin is the most qualified candidate for this bench. He has experience in felony criminal law, and that experience can help keep bad guys off our streets. Our local voters are too smart to ignore that fact because of something like this. Further, he is a forthright and honorable person.
"I hate to think that a Republican primary election in West Texas can come to this. Some of the people on the other side of this campaign I have known for years. If they interpreted the standards this way, there was ample opportunity to call it to my attention, long before any signs were printed. That would have given me the chance to either seek a clarification, or simply bump the size of two letters down a fraction of an inch and rule out all doubt.
--
Originally, we understood the information about the signage was coming from the campaign of Carmen Dusek. Gus Clemens was acting as a subject matter expert.
Comments
Seriously!!!!! Ms. Dusek. I guess if you have no real criminal experience and have a feeling there is no way to beat someone in an election you run out and measure their signs. This is why things are so screwed up in government, law and politics. You just can't stick to the real issues. If that's the best you can say for yourself.... which was nothing but I found 3 letters on his sign too small... you don't have my vote. Not really even worthy of news in this world that we are living in.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkIf we have to worry about the font size of a sign this early in the game, it's going to be a great election. I can't wait to see what comes of this whole mess. The Concho Valley needs to clean house. I hope we are just as focused on issuing equal sentencing for crimes committed regardless of who your attorney is out how much money you come from when this little technical writing class is over!
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkIt is interesting that they want to split hairs over campaign signage. There has been a trailer full of the large billboard signs being prepped for Carmen that has been parked on the street for over a week now. The trailer also has farm tags on it. So not only is the person working for the Carmen campaign breaking the city ordinance by parking the trailer in the street, they are also likely breaking state law by using a farm trailer for political purposes that certainly do not pertain to agricultural use.
I don’t know either of these people campaigning but if someone wants to throw a fit over technicalities in signage they should probably make sure their affairs are squeaky clean first.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkLet's not talk about experience. Dusek must have nothing to talk about, Goodwin's folks forgot to put a "for" on the sign. Who cares, besides you?
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkLooks like someone is going to have to apologize for this story Mr Hyde, she's mad as hell over this
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkPost a comment to this article here: