San Angelo Freedom Defender Fights for His Life Against COVID-19


SAN ANGELO, TX – A San Angelo man, known for his fight against COVID-19 tyranny, is battling for his life after contracting an extremely bad case of the virus.

The following is the statement from Caleb Wallace's wife Jessica.

"Hello, my name is Jessica Wallace. I am Calebs wife. Caleb has unfortunately been intubated due to COVID hitting his lungs hard. Caleb has always worked hard to allow me to be a stay at home mom and now in these difficult times I don’t know where to turn. We have 3 beautiful girls and one more darling that will join us Sept 27. I have had friends and family ask how they can help, and for the longest time bills we’re not on my mind but with Caleb being out for over 2 weeks the bills are approaching and we were not prepared for this to be happening. I need help with mortgage, water, electricity and necessities for the girls. Anything helps at the moment. I’m trying to prepare for this month and the next"

Caleb Wallace is known from around the city as the leader of the San Angelo Freedom Defenders. This group was created in the heat of COVID-19 as officials began mandating masks. San Angelo LIVE! sat down with Caleb in Oct. 2020. Here is that interview.

Most recently Wallace sent a letter to the editor to San Angelo LIVE! To read the piece see: OPINION: SAISD Rescind ALL COVID-Related Policies Immediately

Now Wallace has contracted an extremely bad case of COVID-19. To help him and his family visit the gofundme here.

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.


Most Recent Videos


This a good case for government support programs, universal healthcare, workers rights to include paid time off/sick leave, etc. But republicans will just cry "SoCiALiSm" without actually knowing or being able to explain what socialism is.  

Also, I am seeing a whole lot of people who are against masks and vaccination getting covid, which while unfortunate, is just a big "I told you so" from me.

Besides the fact that the red states that have the least vaccinations are also the states that are the hottest for new covid infections right now? Reading about it, I am not physically watching people get covid, no.

Not to mention this article is about a guy who started a group specifically to stop mask mandates and got covid. BLANC09, another republican against masks and vaccination also got covid. Joe Hyde, a republican and the owner of this website also got covid, although I am not sure of his exact stance he has written articles that are anti vax in nature, and he is definitely against mask mandates.

Also, are you related to the insurance man?

Show me some proof of your position then, all you did was talk, I at least showed some evidence to back up what I was saying.

Tell Craig an anonymous internet person said hi.

Jeff L, Tue, 08/10/2021 - 06:13

Is democratic and currently second in covid cases. Your information is spoiled

I have not seen one from him, ever. Can you repost them here so I can take a look? I can't compare them if I don't have his source(s) now can I?

Not sure I would have to see the source(s) and go from there, but since he (or anyone) never posts any sources I have nothing to go on specifically. Wouldn't be much more than simply googling specific parts of the article to see if they match up with other sources, I also sometimes use to check how factual a website is when searching for something on my own. If a website leans right (or left) that is fine, I am more interested on how factual that site is. Checking the date of an article and comparing to similar sources can often be revealing too. It just depends on the posted source, but no one ever posts there own sources on here, and I constantly ask for proof or evidence of some kind, but it is never provided, so I can't really elaborate much more than that. Lemme know what you think and if you have any pointers for me, although I don't know how often I would really get to use the advice.

Fact check what? I tell you what, name some sites that you trust and your methods of factchecking.

Delete what? What are you talking about? I said that sometimes I used that and the context of the website would tell me how to fact check.

A source for truthful information has become really difficult in this world of big tech and social media.  Who is telling the truth?  I can tell you that stifling speech is not the answer.  We have become so separated in world views that it has become impossible to have reasonable or logical discussions on virtually any topic without resorting to name calling or personal attacks on where you get sources of information.  This current Cov-19 crisis in one important enough to put down the gloves and research.  When researchers and doctors are cancelled on these platforms, it only makes me question the information we are given as truth.  When it comes to my health, it should be a personal choice.  If someone is concerned about becoming ill when interacting will other individuals there are avenues to take to prevent that contact.  If I become ill, treatment should be between my doctor and me and not a government agency that seems to be dictating treatment and procedures.  I saw an article on a doctor that stated that the Cov-19 virus has not been isolated stating numerous FOIA requests for proof of the isolate.  I did a search only looking for articles by the CDC.  I only found this article which only states that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and offered for research but does not mention an isolate for Cov-19.  SARS-CoV-2 is a virus that causes another virus?  That statement is odd considering what I have read about viruses up to this point.  I have always understood that viruses mutate which would account for variants.  This is troubling.  If the vaccines are being produced from a computer model of the Cov-19 virus rather than the actual virus it makes me wonder why.  Maybe everyone could help answer these questions rather than arguing where to get truthful information.  

"you realize just how much sense the Bible makes "

"look at the world through a biblical lens."

"The only solution is Jesus Christ, God himself. "

Now I know you are a complete wack job, the apple doesn't fall far and all that huh? Next you are going to tell me that the earth is only 6,000 years old or some made up BS huh? Knowing you were related to Craig was a huge red flag. Talk about indoctrination, your dad really got you by the huevos didn't he?

"Ad hominem attacks are a good indicator that the delivering party has nothing to stand on."

You are absolutely correct.

" Anyone can hide behind a username  and spout obscenities toward other individuals as it takes no courage to do so. "

You are absolutely correct again, dang you are good at this, and it entertains me that you don't like it. I have even been called a "coward" by none other than Kendal Hemphill AND Joe Hyde, I consider it a great honor to be recognized as such and they are only fanning the flame by calling me names. Unlike you who get all upset when I just tell it like it is about the way people are.

"Now, what specifically do you have against my use of the Bible?"

Which version do you read? I have about 12 different versions of that book that say different things.

We shall start here and I'll let you be on your way,

All religions are for the intellectually/mentally/cognitively stunted who need a crutch in their lives to help them cope with reality. 

I don't need anyone or anything to tell me that the bible is fictitious, it's obvious.

I can see that you are making a poor attempt to either back me into a corner or get me to contradict myself, which I am not going to do with you. So go prey (sic) to your imaginary superheros and I am ending this conversation with you, you can call it a win if you want.

Yep, you win, you are right about everything you said, I must admit defeat and throw in the towel, but not before I bow down to your superiority and walk away with my tail tucked firmly between my legs.

And Matt Younts suddenly DELETES ALL his posts, to the surprise of no one. Looks like another one down, dang I'm good.

Lord, thank you for the person that is behind the username of Me Someone. I pray that one day You will reveal the deep need for You. I pray You comfort them in their times of need. Allow the realization of any deep pains or traumas that may be contributing to the destructive actions that have transpired. I pray you bless him/her in the days ahead in ways that can only be attributed to You. Thank you for Your grace as none of us are worthy of it. Thank you for everything You provide for us, whether we realize it’s from you or not. I pray Your blessing on Me Someone. Amen

"VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.” If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:

  • Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause.
  • Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
  • The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
  • VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
  • VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.

VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public."

Post a comment to this article here:

X Close