'Cemetery of Innocence' Depicts Daily Abortions

 

Students walked passed the ASU library this week, eyes glued on the rows of wooden crosses that lined the grassy area. Many of the passersby appeared perplexed and confused, not sure how to react to the “Cemetery of Innocence”.

But when Lisa Myrice saw the display of over 3,000 crosses representing the number of abortions that take place each day within the United States she knew exactly how she was going to respond.

“I saw it and initially had negative feelings,” Myrice said.

She decided she would walk over and question the organization that set up the display.

Myrice said, “I wanted to know exactly what their views were and why they didn’t believe women deserve a choice.”

At the table that Myrice approached stood three members of ASU’s Pro-Life Rams organization. She engaged them in conversation, and, although her position on the issue did not change through the course of dialogue, said she did gain a greater understanding of the Pro-Life perspective.

“I think it is important that we can talk about such topics openly. The only way we are going to be able to make changes in the future is if we communicate with each other,” Myrice said.

Kim Schwartz, president of ASU’s Pro-Life Rams, said the purpose of this project was to show that “abortion is not a matter of political or personal preference, it is a matter of life and death.”

Schwartz expressed that she was excited to see that people who had questions or didn’t agree with Pro-Life Rams felt comfortable in approaching the group.

“That is what the ‘Cemetery of the Innocence’ is all about—spreading awareness and education,” Schwartz said.

“Each of the 3,300 crosses represents one baby that will lose their life to abortion today in the U.S.,” Schwartz explained. “The red ribbon represents the lives we would lose on abortion day when we still had Planned Parenthood in San Angelo.”

Vincent Salazar, a member of Pro-Life Rams, described the display as an awakening. He said, “It is one thing to say or hear the numbers, but it is another thing to be able to actually visualize the impact.”

Almaelida Lozano, also a member of Pro-Life Rams, said the group had anticipated retaliation to their project.

“We have seen how groups of opposing viewpoints have responded in the past,” Lozano said.

The “Cemetery of Innocence” was displayed Wednesday and Thursday, but due to previous occurrences of vandalism on the campus the university recommended the organization take down the crosses by 5:30 p.m. both days. The Pro-Life Rams, with the help of some local church members, were up setting the crosses by 6:00 both mornings.

“We are just so fortunate to express out First Amendment rights,” Schwartz said. 

Myrice agreed, “It is great that the university allows such a diversity of ideas to be represented by the student body.”

Schwartz said they saw a few people who did not agree with what they were doing but, “The overwhelming majority was supportive.”

She said, “ASU has consistently proved itself to value human life.”

For more information on Pro-Life Rams visit angelo.edu/proliferams. 

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

Because all aborted fetuses are Christian, and the best way to make a point about abortion is a giant religious display on a the campus of a public university. Christofascists. I want to know where their cemetary for the women who died during abortions that were illegal is. Or executed prisoners, for that matter.
What about women with extenuating circumstances? What if not all abortions are performed as a matter of convenience? In fact, what if chocking abortion up to "convenience" as "pro-lifers" often do is minimizing a woman's experience? What of the large number of women each year who are affected by rape, numbering in the thousands upon thousands? Should they be forced to carry the rapist's pregnancy to term? To endure that kind of pain and distress? What about a woman whose child would have a debilitating genetic disorder that would make their life both brief and excruciating? What about conservative voices that want to squash comprehensive sexual education in our schools in favor of watered-down "abstinence-only education" that's been proven ineffective in most comparative studies? Where are all of those conservative voices supporting welfare and assistance for women who carry their pregnancies to term? Where are they when it comes time to adopt the THOUSANDS of children currently awaiting placement with a loving family? The pro-life/conservative stance raises more questions than it answers, it seems...
Lauren Lopez has fallen short of true journalism here. How does she justify the complete lack of representation of the opposing view here. Just looking at the comments on this post, there are plenty of San Angeloans who would love to contribute their voice to this article. Instead, Lopez's article gives the impression that the community is united on this front, which is anything but true. This is not a "simple protest." The arguments for and against abortion rights are nuanced and incredibly complex. To suggest anything otherwise is a disservice to the debate.
live, Sat, 04/19/2014 - 13:37

The story is about a group protesting abortion by placing crosses in the ground. It was not an attempt to rehash the arguments of Margaret Sanger, Adolf Hitler and Wendy Davis.

Can we really call it "scope creep" when you choose to evaluate the other side of a protest in an attempt to be comprehensive in your coverage? I can guarantee you that there were students who voiced some very valid opposing opinions. To me, scope creep appears to be your go-to argument whenever someone brings up how incredibly biased and non-encompassing LIVE!'s articles can be. Instead, just be honest! You want a publication with a conservative slant. Lumping Wendy Davis in with Adolf Hitler more than implies that. Urinating on your audience's collective leg and telling them it's raining really isn't going to work...
Bill Richardson, Sat, 04/19/2014 - 16:52
Equating any American Liberal or Conservative politician to Adolf Hitler is way out of line and diminishes the horror inflicted on the world by Hitler's Nazi regime.
@ "the purpose of this project was to show that “abortion is not a matter of political or personal preference, it is a matter of life and death.” The purpose was to present a vulgar display of Christian propaganda. As usual no solutions are offered, no alternatives are entertained -- just an opportunistic moment to plaster the grounds with crosses and browbeat the public with their self righteous blather. If "spreading awareness and education" was truly the aim here, the focus would be on an open and honest dialogue regarding birth control and sex ed -- rather than the typical "Jesus knows what's best for you" schtick.
It is a good article about a group who supports continued life as opposed to preventing life -- about an organization who is trying to raise awareness about their cause. If you'll do something newsworthy to support killing those babies, and invite Ms. Lopez out to see what you've done, we'll see if she'll give you equal text. If not, THEN complain. And when you complain, use your real name so all your friends and acquaintances know where you stand about things like this.
Pinko, Mon, 04/21/2014 - 13:08
Schwartz and the Pro-Life Rams exhibited such bravery by staging their protest in a town with no access to abortion services. I can understand their problem, however, since they would have to drive HUNDREDS OF MILES to protest in a city that actually provides that service to women. That represents such an inconvenience to those poor pro-life "radicals."

Post a comment to this article here: