The debate has drawn global attention, shining a light on the balance between pet ownership and environmental preservation. .

Duncanville v The Woodlands, Waxahachie v Bridgeland, Longview v Klein Collins, Willis v DeSoto, North Crowley v Coppell, Borden County v Whiteface, Corpus Christi Flour Bluff v San Antonio Southwest, Randle v Brenham, Crowley v Denton Guyer, Richland v Denton Ryan, Londonderry v Pinkerton, Joliet Catholic v Nazareth Academy, East St. Louis v Geneva, Batavia v Chicago Mt. Carmel, Loyola Academy v Elmhurst York Community, Providence v North Judson-San Pierre, Heritage Hills v Fort Wayne Bishop Luers, Decatur Central v Warsaw, Hurricane v Jefferson, Nitro v Bridgeport, North Marion v Princeton, Bluefield v Frankfort, Philip Barbour v Independence, Petersburg v Tug Valley, Doddridge County v Cameron, Pendleton County v Tucker County, St. Vincent v Adrian, Tipton v Penney, Bowling Green v Lamar, Fair Grove v South Shelby, Lift for Life Academy Charter v Seneca, Maryville v Blair Oaks, Festus v Warrenton, Lutheran North v Kearney, MICDS v Platte County, Kirkwood v Nixa, Liberty v De Smet Jesuit, Braymer v North Shelby, Archie v Bishop LeBlond, Burns v Vale, Henley v Marist Catholic, North Medford v South Medford, Adrian v North Douglas, Oakland v St. Paul, Powers v Harper, Axtell v Victoria, Hayden v Andale, Andover Central v Bishop Miege, Cunningham v Weskan, Centralia v Conway Springs, Hoxie v Central Plains, St. Thomas Aquinas v Hays, Forge Christian v Wray, Pomona v Mead, Pueblo West v Montrose, Fairview v Legend, Broomfield v Dakota Ridge, The Classical Academy v Wellington, Green Mountain v Thompson Valley, Valor Christian v Cherry Creek, Stratton v Cheyenne Wells, Haxtun v Akron, Kaiser v KS Maui.
Officials are proposing stricter regulations for cat owners, including mandatory registration and nighttime curfews for the pets.
Kapaa v Konawaena, Scottsdale Christian Academy v Pima, Pusch Ridge Christian Academy v ALA West Foothills, ALA Queen Creek v Basha, Hamilton v Liberty, Paul Laurence Dunbar v Frederick Douglass, Fort Hill v Perryville, Northern Garrett v SEED School of Maryland, St. Pius X v Bloomfield, Artesia v Roswell, Texico v Santa Rosa, Cleveland v La Cueva, Dexter v St. Michael's, Millington v St. Mary Catholic Central, Notre Dame Prep v Frankenmuth, Cass Tech v Hudsonville, Zeeland West v Detroit MLK, Hampton v Phoebus, Washington-Liberty v James Madison, Essex v Rappahannock, Tuscarora v John Champe, Varina v Dinwiddie, Union v Graham, Fairfax v Lake Braddock, Bonita Vista v Monte Vista, San Pasqual v St. Augustine, Granite Hills v San Marcos, Newbury Park v Murrieta Valley, Silverado v St. Anthony, San Gabriel v Pioneer, Hughson v Sutter, Vanden v Oakdale, Stone Ridge Christian v Summerville, Oak Ridge v Folsom, Sacred Heart Prep v Burlingame, Leland v Sequoia, Palma School v Wilcox, Gahr v Pasadena, Van Nuys v Panorama, Chatsworth v South Gate, Palisades v King/Drew, Arcata v Miramonte, Redwood v American Canyon, Ferndale v Moreau Catholic, Sonoma Valley v St. Vincent de Paul, Orland v Lassen, Red Bluff v Pleasant Valley, Westview v El Capitan, Poway v Mater Dei Catholic, Pittsburg v San Ramon Valley, Campolindo v Acalanes, Bishop O'Dowd v Amador Valley, San Pedro v Narbonne, Saint Francis v Los Gatos, Aptos v Carmel, Mira Monte v Lindsay, Central Valley Christian v Bakersfield Christian, Selma v Morro Bay, Kerman v Madera, Coalinga v Shafter, El Rancho v Portola, Mater Dei v St. John Bosco, Glendora v Murrieta Mesa, St. Pius X/St. Matthias Academy v Serrano, Palmdale v Carter, La Serna v Palos Verdes, Edison v Simi Valley, St. Bonaventure v Pacifica, Warren v Rio Hondo Prep, Woodrow Wilson/Long Beach v Highland, Bradshaw Christian v Sonora, Twelve Bridges v Patterson, Grant v Rocklin.
While conservationists support the move to protect endangered birds and lizards, many residents argue that the measures go too far. .