Mediano Found Guilty of Sexually Assaulting and Impregnating 12-Year-Old Niece

 

Today, at approximately 6:45 p.m., a jury of six men and women came back with a guilty verdict beyond a reasonable doubt that Jacob Mediano, 29, of San Angelo, sexually assaulted and impregnated his 12-year-old niece.
[[{"fid":"19495","view_mode":"default","type":"media","attributes":{"alt":"Jacob Mediano walks from the courthouse to the Tom Green County Jail after being found guilty. (LIVE! Photo/Zoey Hanrahan)","title":"Jacob Mediano walks from the courthouse to the Tom Green County Jail after being found guilty. (LIVE! Photo/Zoey Hanrahan)","height":"675","width":"1200","class":"media-element file-default imgbody"}}]]

In an event-filled second day, the jury heard testimony from the victim, now 15 years old, a retired Texas Ranger who helped with the DNA testing, a forensic DNA analyst from the University of North Texas Crime Lab who performed the paternity test that proved Mediano had a 99.998 percent probability of being the baby’s child. The jury also heard from the victim’s mother, Michelle Chavez Schwanz. The Defense called on Schwanz, who testified and said the victim had a tendency to not be truthful, which is why she was removed from Schwanz’s custody by Child Protective Services.

[[{"fid":"19494","view_mode":"default","type":"media","attributes":{"alt":"Jacob Mediano walks from the courthouse to the Tom Green County Jail after being found guilty. (LIVE! Photo/Zoey Hanrahan)","title":"Jacob Mediano walks from the courthouse to the Tom Green County Jail after being found guilty. (LIVE! Photo/Zoey Hanrahan)","height":"675","width":"1200","class":"media-element file-default imgbody"}}]]

However, despite Defense Attorney James Millan’s attempts to discredit the victim and transfer the suspicion of blame onto the victim’s father, Jeremiah Mediano, who was previously convicted for a similar crime in 2000, the jury found Mediano guilty. Judge Tom Gossett revoked Mediano’s bond, and he was taken into custody until his sentencing Wednesday morning.

[[{"fid":"19493","view_mode":"default","type":"media","attributes":{"alt":"Jacob Mediano walks from the courthouse to the Tom Green County Jail after being found guilty. (LIVE! Photo/Zoey Hanrahan)","title":"Jacob Mediano walks from the courthouse to the Tom Green County Jail after being found guilty. (LIVE! Photo/Zoey Hanrahan)","height":"675","width":"1200","class":"media-element file-default imgbody"}}]]

Mediano chose not to receive punishment by jury, so Judge Gossett will decide his fate tomorrow morning at 10 a.m.

Stay tuned for that information and more details into today’s testimony.

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

Can you please clarify the sentence
"the paternity test that proved Mediano had a 99.998 percent probability of being the baby’s child, and from the victim’s mother, Michelle Chavez Schwanz."
To me it appears to read that the baby is the child of the victim's uncle and her mother? However, pretty sure that I am just misreading it. Thank you

That was a bit of a long sentence, so I can see why you may have misread it. The beginning said, "The jury heard testimony from....," and the mother was one of the people they heard testimony from. I had a relative clause in there prior to that, which may have confused things (who performed the paternity test....). To help clarify, I changed it a little. I hope that helps.

Regards,

Brandy

Thank you, I thought that's what was being said but wasn't sure. I think the "baby's child" played a part in that too, but it's much clearer to me now. And im not criticizing, just wanted to make sure I understood it right. Thank you.

Post a comment to this article here: