By Sneha Dey and Rob Reid, The Texas Tribune
AUSTIN, TX — Texas public school ratings — which grade how well districts educate their students — drastically dropped after the state implemented stricter scoring standards, new data released Thursday shows.
Low performance ratings on the state’s A-F scale set the stage for big consequences. Parents may enroll their students at a different campus, and businesses may forgo investments in those communities. Districts that get consecutive failing grades can face bruising state sanctions, like an order to shut down underperforming schools or a state takeover.
[Texas school districts got their first A-F grades in five years. See how your school did here.]
The Thursday release of ratings for the 2022-23 school year marked the first time failing grades for districts have been made public in five years. The percentage of schools in the state that got an F rating increased from 4.5% in 2019 to 7.6% in 2023.
Of the 8,539 public schools evaluated in the state, 19.3% received an A. Another 33.6% got a B, 24.7% a C, and 14.8% a D.
Fort Worth ISD was the only district that had a school get an F rating five years in a row, meeting the threshold for a state takeover, the highest level of state intervention.
Performance scores for schools and districts are based on three categories: how students perform on state tests and meet college and career readiness benchmarks; how students improve over time; and how well schools are educating the state’s most disadvantaged students.
TEA Commissioner Mike Morath interpreted the 2022-23 declines as a stabilization of student improvement after rapid recoveries following the pandemic. School districts across the state, meanwhile, say new accountability standards made it harder to get a high rating.
Ratings dropped for districts under stricter standards
The 2023 ratings show 56% of Texas’ high schools had more of their seniors prove they were ready for college, the military or the workforce than the previous school year. At the same time, nearly 90% of campuses saw their student readiness score decrease, a reflection of higher standards that went into effect that year.
“We keep raising the bar so that Texas is a leader in preparing students for postsecondary success,” Morath said during a call with reporters Tuesday.
In the 2022-23 school year, for the first time, TEA only awarded an A in college and career readiness when 88% of a school’s graduates were considered ready for life after high school. That’s up from 60% in previous years.
A legal battle blocked the release of the ratings for 19 months. More than 120 districts across the state argued TEA did not give them adequate notice before rolling out stricter college and career readiness benchmarks.
An appeals court earlier this month ruled that Morath did not overstep his authority when he made those changes, clearing TEA to make the 2023 A-F grades public.
The role poverty plays in ratings
Districts with higher rates of low-income students were more likely to get a D or an F than their wealthier counterparts. Almost none of the school districts with a rate of low-income students lower than 20% received an overall rating of D or F.
Schools in lower-income areas are often working with fewer resources to meet the same goalposts as every other school in the state. Opponents of the rating system say it is unfair for schools working with fewer resources and doesn’t reflect the enormous needs of educating students coming from struggling families.
Chronically underperforming schools put districts at risk of sanctions
The ratings released Thursday show Leadership Academy at Forest Oak Sixth Grade in Fort Worth was the only school that has accrued five consecutive years of failing scores.
Teachers have struggled to build out high-quality curricula for math and reading because of leadership turnover, contributing to years of low performance ratings, Fort Worth ISD Superintendent Karen Molinar said.
“The ratings are not new to us, even though they're just newly released,” Molinar said. “We're making changes. They're very bold, but they have a sense of urgency.”
Molinar said the district will have Texas Wesleyan University help oversee operations. That kind of partnership is a life raft for struggling districts: Handing over the management of underperforming schools to a nonprofit, university or charter group means a two-year pause from sanctions.
The Fort Worth ISD school board also voted last month to close the Leadership Academy at Forest Oak Sixth Grade and move students to the Leadership Academy at Forest Oak Middle School.
At least five other districts across the state had campuses with four years of unacceptable grades, bringing them closer to state sanctions.
One of those districts, Wichita Falls ISD, shut down Kirby Middle School in 2023 and moved students to a new building. But a TEA spokesperson said district leadership largely stayed the same, which means their failing grades — and the possibility of state sanctions that come with them — will follow them to their new campus.
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/04/24/texas-schools-accountability-ratings/.
Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily
Required
Comments
Listed By: Old Buffalo Hunter
San Angelo Taxpayers need to pass this bond and ask for double next year. We want an F, We want an F, Drew Darby for Senate!
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkListed By: Rita Repulsa
For too long, the people of House District 72—those hardworking families of Tom Green, Coleman, Runnels, and the rural counties of West Texas—have placed their trust in Drew Darby, a so-called representative who claims to champion their interests. But peel back the veneer of his rhetoric, and what do you find? A man whose actions on public education, the very lifeblood of our children’s future, have left his district’s students stranded in a system starved of resources and vision. Darby’s tenure is not a story of service but of squandered opportunity, a betrayal of the very communities he swore to uplift.
Look at the state of Texas public schools, particularly in rural districts like those Darby represents. The Texas Education Agency’s recent accountability ratings—released in April 2025 after a 19-month legal battle—paint a grim picture: one in five Texas schools scored a D or F, with rural and poorer districts hit hardest. These are the schools serving Darby’s constituents, where students already face the challenges of isolation, limited resources, and economic hardship. Yet what has Darby done to reverse this tide? Precious little. Instead, he’s played the political game, aligning himself with forces that undermine the very schools he’s supposed to protect.
Darby’s most egregious misstep is his waffling on school funding and his failure to decisively fight for the public education system that rural West Texas depends on. Last session, when Governor Abbott tied a $7.6 billion boost in education funding to the passage of a voucher program—a scheme that would siphon public dollars to private schools—Darby stood among the 21 Republicans who voted to strip vouchers from the bill. Sounds noble, doesn’t it? But don’t be fooled. This wasn’t a principled stand for public schools; it was a half-measure, a dodge to avoid the wrath of his rural base while failing to secure the funding those schools desperately needed. The result? No vouchers, sure, but also no new money for schools grappling with budget deficits, teacher shortages, and crumbling infrastructure. Darby’s district, with its small, underfunded schools, felt the sting of that inaction most acutely.
And what of the students themselves? In Darby’s district, where many families can’t afford private alternatives, public schools are the only path to opportunity. Yet under his watch, Texas has slashed $607 million in Medicaid funding for special education, gutting services for the most vulnerable students—those with disabilities who rely on counseling, therapy, and transportation. Did Darby raise a firestorm over this? Did he rally his colleagues to restore those funds? No. He sat idly by as the state tightened the screws on rural districts, leaving principals and teachers to scrape by with less while students suffered.
Darby’s defenders might point to his long tenure, his claims of “supporting public education,” or his recent re-election as proof of his virtue. But longevity is no substitute for results, and his victory—secured by just 56% of the vote against a challenger backed by Abbott—shows a district growing weary of his empty promises. The truth is, Darby’s loyalty lies not with the students of House District 72 but with the political machine that keeps him in power. He’s quick to tout his conservative credentials, yet when it comes to the hard fight for adequate school funding, teacher pay, or infrastructure, he’s nowhere to be found. His rhetoric about “rural values” rings hollow when rural schools in his district are left to decay.
The people of West Texas deserve better. They deserve a representative who sees public education not as a bargaining chip but as a sacred trust—a system that must be fought for, funded, and fortified against those who’d bleed it dry for private gain. Drew Darby has had his chance, nearly two decades in the Texas House, and he’s failed that test. His inaction, his compromises, his refusal to stand firm for the schools that shape our children’s futures—these are not mere oversights but a betrayal of the very heart of rural Texas. It’s time for House District 72 to demand more than a career politician’s platitudes. It’s time for a reckoning.
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/04/24/texas-schools-accountability-ratings/
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/01/24/texas-senate-school-choice-vouchers-education-savings-accounts/
https://news.yahoo.com/gov-abbott-visits-san-angelo-182623285.html
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/01/24/texas-senate-school-choice-vouchers-education-savings-accounts/
https://www.texastribune.org/2024/10/28/texas-shars-medicaid-special-education/
https://www.colemantoday.com/news/representative-drew-darby-wins-re-election-in-house-district-72/article_ff451884-dc8d-11ee-befc-5b46dd256051.html
https://sanangelolive.com/news/politics/2024-03-06/darby-addresses-last-nights-victory
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkListed By:
Has anyone actually looked at the planned "improvements" they intend on spending that 390 million on?? None of them are educational. Fine arts at lakeview.... how about teaching them anything else from a public schools normal curriculum that they're already failing at??? It's no surprise why the last bond failed and why this one will as well.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkListed By: Wiley Coyote
WOW!! 1 out of 5.
Vote for the bond!!!
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkPost a comment to this article here: