County Abates Hoarder's Junk Lot

 

The brisk morning air was riddled with the roar of machinery and the crunch of junk under tires and treads.

Furniture, clothes, barrels, scrap metal, gates, paint cans, wood, televisions, glass fixtures, Christmas trees and lights, tents, sleeping bags, cushions, ice chests, and a shopping cart, were just a few of the identifiable objects located in the heap surrounding the dilapidated house.

[[{"fid":"1904","view_mode":"default","fields":{"format":"default"},"type":"media","attributes":{}}]]

Rather than being disturbed by the noise, the neighbors all watched with glee as the neighborhood eyesore was crushed, loaded and trucked away.

“Everyone’s been coming out watching, just ‘thank you thank you thank you,’” said Precinct 4 Constable Randy Harris.

The small county crew worked diligently, first pulling out any dangerous items they could find, such as propane tanks, before sending the bulldozer in to crush up the junk.

“They run over it to break it up into little pieces,” said Harris, “then the front end loader scoops it up to put in the truck.”

At the time, there were four dump trucks awaiting a load with a larger one on the way after it was evident that four would not be enough.

Two full loads did not clear half of the junk just in the front yard, not including the house itself or the backyard.

“The inside is just as bad as the outside,” explained Harris.

That is a bittersweet notion for the neighboring house and two sister’s who’ve been visiting it for years.

“Great Grandaddy bought the house in 1939,” said Lynna Nixon, “ever since then it’s been in the family.”

“We [the family] kept this house as a family reunion house,” she explained. “We maintain it, pay taxes, and then it’s a place to stay.”

But reunions and vacations have been plagued by the junk next door for years.

“Last three or four years have been difficult because we couldn’t get in our driveway and there was always so much trash, and it’s horrible to look at,” said Donna Pearson, Nixon’s sister. “We come to relax, we can’t pull up in the yard. It’s not a relaxing experience.”

The ladies gave the county permission to use their front and back yard in order to have easier access for clean-up.

While they may have had sympathy for the owner of the house and junk at first, the years have eroded those feelings.

“It’s not like he didn’t have prior or advanced warning, and the last three years he had them pretty regularly,” said Pearson. “People offered to help, to get the neighborhood to help him clean it up.”

They explained that Mr. Louis did not take heed of any of the citations for public nuisance for many years, a fact that was corroborated by Constables Harris and Dickson.

“Most people make sincere efforts to comply,” said Harris. “With this guy, there was no effort made for three years.”

Mr. Louis was nowhere to be found as trucks were hauling his collection away.

“Neighbors haven’t seen him in a week,” said Constable Deen Dickson of Precinct Two.

Bystanders voiced the concern of ‘how could anyone live like this?” To which Constable Harris answered, “He hasn’t lived here in over nine months, we know he has somewhere to stay, we just don’t know where.”

According to Harris, the crew should be finished with the clearing and demolition sometime tomorrow.

As for Pearson, she plans on sitting outside and drinking wine to celebrate.

http://sanangelolive.com/news/2013-11-12/hoarders-junk-lot-be-cleared-tom-green-county-authorities

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

I want to take a moment to address what I believe to be some very insensitive journalism here. While remaining sensitive may not necessarily be a goal of journalism, I believe that being informed and educated before you put pen to paper certainly *is*. Hoarding is considered a mental illness, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - the very manual that mental health professionals use to diagnose psychiatric issues. Hoarding has its roots in obsessive-compulsive thinking. While I understand that the implications of such a disorder can be seen as an inconvenience for neighbors, to the point that it can create a disruption in the neighborhood or a decrease in property value over time, I don't see the purpose of further exploiting a person by putting it in print. What purpose did this serve? How are we now more informed than we were before reading it - that a man *possibly* afflicted with something he has little control over had a problem with neighbors and is now having his belongings abated by county officials? This should have remained an issue between the individual in the story, his neighbors, and the county. I am certain that this individual is far MORE than a "Hoarder," as the title leads us to believe, and is deserving of a little more scrutiny on the part of the writer of the article. Instead, we see a focus on neighbors "celebrating," questions as to "how anyone could live like this," and even further delving into the private life of this man with the commentary "the inside is just as bad as the outside." Stepping away from the article and author above, this is not the first time I have noticed San Angelo LIVE! engaging in this kind of insensitive journalism. Any time we see a story on individuals arrested on charges, it's not enough that the authors simply report the charges and individuals arrested - they have to make some kind of spectacle out of them by referring to a perceived lack of intelligence or another quality for which the author has no evidence. It seems we forget that individuals in this country are innocent until proven guilty, which is remarkable given all of the local constitutional scholars complaining that Obama is coming for their guns and that there exists a "war on religion" in violation of the First Amendment. But I digress... I've seen derogatory terms used in many of these cases, and I have "news" for you. It doesn't make you edgy. You're not about to win a Pulitzer because you *think* you know the underlying cause for a person's behavior, accused or otherwise and, in most cases, you're not impressing anyone but yourself. If you want San Angelo LIVE! to be taken seriously, I strongly suggest some changes be made to the professionalism and sensitivity with which you report. Otherwise, I will be sticking to gosanangelo.com and the Standard Times for my local news.
live, Sat, 12/14/2013 - 13:03

The article above simply describes the scene as the cleanup took place. We're not psychiatrists, and despite the needs you say this landowner demands, there apparently were no psychiatrists on location to offer their analysis.

Your point is taken about the crime reports. We already calmed that down a bit. 

Nice ploy. "We're simply describing the scene." You have a choice with regard to which news and details you report and which news and details you don't. You also have a choice to conceal the identity of the person, or not. I'm simply stating my opinion that making something like this widely public without looking deeper into the person involved wasn't the best option. You don't have to be a psychiatrist to figure out that these behaviors are not the norm, and all it takes is picking up a book or reading an article to educate yourself.
live, Sat, 12/14/2013 - 14:42

The facts are that this landowner has been found guilty of trashing up his property and that the county legally has the responsibility to clean it up and put a lien on the property for eventual payment. There's no more to this story than the county cleaned it up.

You demand that we abandon objectivity and instead move over into la-la land and report from a vantage point of neutrality. You are assuming that, regardless of facts, trial, or verdict, that the landowner and county have static, neutral standings vis a vis one another. To you the landowner lost, but that's not fair. There's a reason the landowner broke the law: He has a disability! (your assumption, not mine). If you want more of that, read any other website out there.

Nothing is neutral in this world, no matter how you try to spin it. Besides that, delving into the mental illness of hoarders is scope creep. 

I do not always agree with the slant taken by what I affectionately call "The Olive". I rarely agree with anything or anyone 100%. That being said, I enjoy the flavor of the articles--what I would call "casual", I guess, rather than hard line journalism. Keep it up!
I never asked you to abandon objectivity, delve into "la la land," or even report from a vantage of neutrality. Honestly, I see no reason this needed to be reported at all, which is precisely the point I was trying to make. No one asked that you "scope creep" into the field of psychiatry, but to merely recognize that, MAYBE, there is something more to the individual than what we can see and help maintain some level of dignity in that regard by finding something else to write a story about. Anywho, I appreciate the feedback, and I wish your blog the best.
live, Sat, 12/14/2013 - 15:44

We don't pick and choose stories based upon any agenda other than to inform and engage the reader and grow our audience. I agree that whether cover or not cover a story is a choice, and we've (so far) stayed out of favoring one clique over another. San Angelo is a target-rich environment for interesting stories. I think how we choose them well is reflected in our readership. Of course we can always do better and will.

This story grew out of the trash coverage that I did earlier this year. Then-commissioner Steve Floyd explained many of the problems that the county has with dumping due to ineffective laws to combat it. One of those problems was that the county did not have the authority to condemn a tract of land for dumping, even though state law allowed a county government to pass an ordinance to do so. The Tom Green County Commissioners' Court passed such a law in early September, and this is the first implementation of it. This particular case has been ongoing for years and judging from the engagement on this story, it's interesting to many. 

You are welcome to submit a story on mental illness of hoaders. We'd probably not publish it because quite frankly, we don't generally publish tomes from bloggers. BIG GRIN!

And, no worries. I wouldn't associate my name or any of my intellectual property with a "news source" that, overall, appears to lack an ethical compass. If I wanted to submit something, I'd go for a site with larger reach and readership. You can preach about "objectivity" once the childish digs in your news stories toward others STOP and are not merely "calmed down a bit." Otherwise, I sincerely hope that none of the people you've recently bashed wise-up and file defamation suits - because some of it has dangerously approached libel. As for this story, I've spoken my peace. My best! *BIG GRIN*
Keep up the good work. I enjoy how the articles are written and the comments from those that don't are just as entertaining.
If someone is going to take the time and effort to write rants, I would appreciate knowing their name. It is easy to criticize behind a computer screen. Kim Mikeska San Angelo
While reading the rants, I have seen every persons name underneath the picture. You should look before you speak. :-)
LOOK before we speak? What kind of crazy talk is that? Next you'll be expecting us to THINK before we post! ;-)
The person in question does not have a name just a "title" ThoughtCrime please look before speaking.
Shonna Schorre - "Mr. Louis was nowhere to be found as trucks were hauling his collection away." You were saying?

Post a comment to this article here: