Class Action Lawsuit Will Seek at Least $27 Million in Damages Over San Angelo Trash Controversy

 

Plaintiffs are seeking at least $27 million in refunds and damages over Republic Service’s billing practices for commercial customers. The plaintiffs are also seeking all court fees and attorney fees, along with interest.

The lawsuit, a draft of which was reviewed by LIVE!, will be filed against Republic Services this week for the alleged overbilling of commercial customers in San Angelo. Petitioners will argue that Republic Services harmed commercial trash-pickup customers within the City of San Angelo by charging fees not authorized by City ordinance.

Specifically, the plaintiffs said, commercial trash customers’ bills show a single line for “Total Fuel/Environmental Recovery Fee” that is alleged to be equal to 32 to 34 percent of the roll-off trash service charges.

A City franchise fee, four percent, was charged against these customers’ inflated amount on a separate line on customer invoices.

The plaintiffs will argue that commercial trash customers with trash service in containers that are commonly referred to as “dumpsters” were affected.

The lawsuit alleges Republic Services of:

  1. Breach of contract: By invoicing and cashing checks of customers for service, plaintiffs allege that Republic was in a legal contract with all of them. And because the invoicing amount is alleged to not be legal, Republic was in breach of contract with the plaintiffs.
  2. Unjust enrichment: If this allegation is proven, the plaintiffs are seeking treble damages (or three times the judgment amount).
  3. Discriminatory Treatment by a Public Utility: Residential customers were only charged 5 percent fuel surcharges, and customers with carts were charged only 6.4 percent. Meanwhile commercial dumpster customers were charged 33 to 34 percent in surcharges. This was discrimination, the plaintiffs alleged.
  4. Deceptive Trade Practices.

The plaintiffs will ask the court to certify the plaintiffs as a class since there are common issues and calculations of the amount of the harm.

[[{"fid":"6352","view_mode":"wysiwyg","fields":{"format":"wysiwyg","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":"The San Angelo ISD trash invoice from Republic that shows the 'Fuel Charges/Environmental Recovery Fee' line item. (LIVE! Photo/Joe Hyde)","field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]":"The San Angelo ISD trash invoice from Republic that shows the 'Fuel Charges/Environmental Recovery Fee' line item. (LIVE! Photo/Joe Hyde)"},"type":"media","attributes":{}}]]

Above: A Republic Services invoice paid by the San Angelo ISD in Oct. 2013. This shows the single line item. "Total Fuel/Environmental Recovery Fee" and the four percent franchise fee assessed against the inflated amount. San Angelo ISD is considered a commercial trash customer.

The lawsuit will seek approximately $9 million, which is the approximate calculated amount of the alleged illegal surcharges over 14 years, plus all legal fees, court costs, and interest.

The San Angelo attorney representing the plaintiffs is Paul Stipanovic of the San Angelo law firm Gossett, Harrison, Millican & Stipanovic, PC.

The plaintiffs have yet to be named, but the organization of the class action lawsuit is being conducted by Texas Disposal Systems, or TDS. TDS CEO Bob Gregory made the allegation of Republic's overcharging of commercial customers in his cover letter in the TDS bid for the City of San Angelo trash pickup and landfill management requests for proposals on April 1. We reported on the allegation in depth two weeks later, followed by the local newspaper, who revealed that their company, Scripps, was paying the suspect charges.

Since then, Republic officials have been silent on the matter. The City to this day, some three months later, said that they are "researching" the charges. Earlier this week, Mayor Dwain Morrison said that Republic will hold a news conference this week to explain everything. So far, no official announcement of a news conference has been made. However, word of a Republic news conference at 9 a.m. Monday morning is circulating.

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

It could be seen as another trash service company wasn't happy with the decision the mayor made to reject it's bid?
Instead of just calling it a case of a "sore loser" wouldn't it be prudent to wait for the facts to come out in court? The plaintiffs may, after all, have a legitimate case of overcharging against Republic Services.
I can't be the only one who finds it odd that our city is still willing to deal with a company that allegedly over charged customers.it's been said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. looks like some people in the city should be locked up in an insane asylum then.
What is Republic going to do about the overcharges to the customers both residential and commercial that are outside the city limits?
We are in a neighborhood outside the city limits and had residential dumpster service with Republic and their various other names for 6 years. Our bill started at about $60 and ended at over $100. Whenever we would notice an increase, all we had to do was call and complain (low key complain) and they would back off the increase with no argument or discussion. No company which is making legitimate raises should be able to do that. Fuel surcharges were arbitrary and excessive. What is going to be the oversight on all of the variables that are built into this contract? Does no one in a position of authority in S.A. even own a calculator? On the East Coast, it is a foregone conclusion that waste disposal is a "mobbed up racket". Are we so removed from reality that we cannot see the similarities in operation? Maybe the qualifications for your decision making group need a little review.

Post a comment to this article here: