Don't Give San Angelo ISD More Money via Bond Until We See Academic Improvement

 

OPINION — I read with interest Dr. Kingman’s letter in support of the coming school bond election. I agree wholeheartedly with his opening statement:

“Public education is critical for the preservation of a thriving and free society. As with every area of society, a quality public education system must continue to improve and evolve to assure the tenets of student achievement and success are met.”

Unfortunately the quality of education our children are receiving in the San Angelo ISD has not been improving. In fact, it has been deteriorating for years. In the last decade, San Angelo ISD’s academic rating dropped from 53.9% to 37.5%.

That’s nothing to be proud of. In this last year, between 2017 and 2018, San Angelo ISD dropped from 3 Stars to 1 Star in the state’s 5-Star rating system. No, Dr. Kingman, the educational system in San Angelo has not been improving, and building another gym at Central High School is not going to make things better.

In the headline article in the San Angelo Standard-Times on Thursday, October 18, the school district tried to explain why our schools have gotten failing grades in the state’s STAAR program. The administration honed in like vultures on the seat of the problem:

“…that was simply because our kids couldn’t read.” The principal at Lamar Elementary elaborated further. “…we’ve got to close the gap and do something because they are going to the next grade level not knowing how to read at all.”

This reminds me of the kid who murders both his parents and then appeals to the court for mercy because he’s an orphan. It is an elementary school’s job, its only job, to teach kids how to read and write and figure. No matter what other skills it may teach them, no matter how many awards the teachers or students may get, if the kids can’t read, the teachers, the principal and the system are failures. No excuses. No explanations. Lamar is a failure.

I’m picking on Lamar because it’s a convenient target, but it’s not alone. Lamar got a “1” rating in the state’s Star rating system. So did Austin, Fannin, Goliad, Reagan and San Jacinto at the elementary level. Bradford got a zero! Lincoln got a “1” at the middle school level, and Lake View High School received a “1” at the high school level. Only two elementary schools, Glenmore and Fort Concho, received the highest rating, 5 Stars. Santa Rita Elementary, which had been a 5-Star school in the past, has dropped to 4 Stars. (Data source: test scores: Texas Education Agency, ratings: SchoolDigger.com)

Our children deserve better, much, much better.

Let’s be clear. The quality of education is not dependent on tax rates or the age of facilities. Glenmore (5 stars) is an old school (80+ years). Bradford (0 stars) is a new school. The fact is there is no correlation between the age and condition of school facilities and test scores. But there is a direct correlation between the quality of instruction and student achievement. None of the schools in San Angelo ISD have placed lesson plans online for parents to examine and evaluate in at least 6 years. Why? Their excuse, that they are being rewritten, is just that, an excuse. Does it mean there are no lesson plans and teachers are making them up as they go along? Or is the district trying to hide something?

Whatever the explanations/excuses, the fact remains that the San Angelo ISD is failing its mission. No amount of dollars spent on 3,000-seat multi-purpose facilities or fancy new lobbies is going to improve the education our children are being subjected to. It’s time to empty out the school administration building, hire experienced teachers and retire school board members. Until those things happen the long, downward spiral of the San Angelo ISD will continue. With a 28 percent achievement score, at least it doesn’t have too much further to fall.

I urge every San Angeloan casting a ballot in the upcoming general election to vote NO on Proposition A and Proposition B of the school bond. All a ”yes” vote will accomplish is burden your children and grandchildren with another $145M, plus interest, for the next 25 years. The money won’t do a thing to improve our public education.

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

SAISD has the notion that if we, the taxpayers, vote yes for the bond and the schools get shiny new buildings, all the problems will be fixed. The last bond election (which we are still paying for, by the way) provided Central High School a new copper roof, among other things...how's that workin' out for ya?
Vote no, do not let our kids inherit more debt. There is too much pork and waste in these bonds.

Next they will want a $60 million dollar stadium to rival the ones in the new district. If it takes a new gym to teach kids to read, ask Austin for funding. The State Government is charged with funding safe and effective schools.

I have no remedy other than leadership change for the poor results coming out of several campuses. The Superintendent should have to answer with a pay cut, or get out of the way for someone else to give it a try.

if I still lived there. I did vote no last time it came up. I know firsthand what the schools are like. The teachers try but can only do so much. My child went to school there for a long time and wasn't challenged. I notice the only schools that got good ratings are the ones where all the money goes. They need to restructure the administration and take pay cuts at the admin level to prove they are serious about it being for the kids etc.

If we blame the schools for failing children we are missing the real issue. That is the drug epidemic that has caused children to lack structure, direction and a sense of safety that every child needs to be successful in school. I don't think the school is doing everything they can, there is too much bureaucracy and it is top heavy. Classroom teachers are trying very hard, but they cannot raise children and the kids are not ready to learn. Stop blaming the elementary teachers for all issues in society. Do you really think that the teachers in a high performing school are better than a low performing school? It's not that simple.
I also will vote no, I was hoping that the bond would address the safety and security concerns ONLY. Ken did a good job showing the economic differences between San Angelo and communities that the school district compares us to.
I wish the proponents of the bond would stop telling seniors that their taxes are not going up, do we vote for something because someone else will pay?

Mr. Ken Casper, I applaud you sir. What a point blank letter uncovering the truth. I wish this letter could be mailed to every household in San Angelo to read before going to polls, I doubt 10% of the citizens living here and a bunch of the voters have no clue about what has been brought out. For the sake of our community, please everyone, vote a big fat NO to prop A and another big fat NO to prop B.......
And again, thank you Ken Casper for bringing this to the forefront.

As a teacher who works hard to teach the children of San Angelo I find this article very offensive. Teachers are not the problem, there's many issues to factor into student failure. SAISD spends lots of money to train teachers and is very concerned with student success. I may not completely agree with the Bond but I can tell you that teachers have enormous amounts of pressure on us and SAISD had no problem firing teachers they feel aren't up to par. Student succuss also starts at home, and schools build on that.

Post a comment to this article here: