Texas Disposal Systems to Defy City, Republic and Offer Trash Collection

 

Texas Disposal Systems fired the first volley directly at Republic Services starting in earnest the Great San Angelo Trash War of 2014 Wednesday.

At the monthly San Angelo Home Builders’ Association meeting at noon, Rick Fraumann, TDS Director of Sales announced that TDS would begin offering commercial roll-off trash collection services to construction sites within the city limits.

This is a bold move because the conventional wisdom among the homebuilders and other commercial building contractors has been that Republic Services has an exclusivity arrangement with the City. That is, Republic’s agreement with the City is that only Republic trucks can haul trash on city streets.

TDS spokesman Ryan Beard said that State Law supersedes City ordinances that establish exclusivity in construction site trash collection, as expressed in the State Health and Safety Code, Section 364.

Last week, San Angelo homebuilder Kevin Bond, Bond Custom Building, lamented that there was no competition in construction site trash services. He said he had been operating under the assumption that the only two ways to dispose of construction trash was to either haul it to the dump himself and pay for disposal by the ton, or hire Republic. “If I hired another contractor other than Republic--even if I hired a guy and a truck with a trailer--to do that, it would be illegal,” he said.

In the home construction business, Bond said, “Every little cost adds up. You can nickel and dime yourself out of business. Every time you turn around, there’s another $1000 or even $100 expense. I’d just like to keep the costs reasonable and competition is important.”

Commercial construction activity is in high gear south of the Houston-Harte Expressway near Sunset Dr. where the former Grahams Central Station was. There, several hotels are being built. Laren Craig, President of Greenstreet Construction in Lubbock, is the general contractor for the construction of the new Courtyard by Marriott. Having worked in various municipalities around the state, he said that in general about 50% of cities have an exclusivity arrangement for trash collection. The others don’t. He prefers the latter, with more competition. That way, he can negotiate a more cost-effective contract based upon his normal volume of trash.

“A 76,000 square foot project like San Angelo’s Marriott can see up to 15 containers on the project site,” Craig said. “No competition can drive up our costs for waste disposal by 20% or so,” he said.

TDS’ Beard said that their rates would be approximately 30% less than Republic’s.

Allegations About Republic’s Billing Practices

The TDS announcement comes on the heels of TDS’ allegation made at the beginning of the month that incumbent City of San Angelo trash collector Republic Services has been overcharging commercial entities within the city for dumpster and roll-off trash collection for years.

Republic surcharges like for the “Environmental Recovery Fee” are what TDS CEO Bob Gregory said are not authorized by the City Council, and therefore in violation of the existing contract between Republic and the City.

Gregory has audited several Republic invoices in a convenience sampling to support his charges. One of the businesses in his sampling is his other company, San Angelo-based Acme Iron and Metal Co.

Republic direct-bills commercial entities, so it’s doubtful that commercial invoices are universally vetted by the City staff to enforce code compliance.

“The recent customer bills that we have reviewed show additional Fuel/Environmental Recovery fees added to commercial customer invoices in excess of 32% above the City ordinance rates,” Gregory wrote. Attached to his memo were the example invoices highlighting the suspect charges.

Republic details their surcharges on their website.

City Council Confident in Selection of Republic

Despite the allegations, San Angelo Mayor Dwain Morrison, Councilman Rodney Fleming, and Councilwoman Charlotte Farmer are confident in their selection of Republic as the winner of the RFP. The entire Council voted 6-0 to begin negotiations to renew the trash collection and landfill management contract with Republic earlier this month.

Morrison said in an interview this afternoon that the council was briefed by the selection committee—Wardlaw, Fleming, Farmer, City Manager Daniel Valenzuela, Assistant City Manager Michael Dane, and City Operations Director Shane Kelton (and others)—that the contest between Republic and TDS wasn’t even close.

“That’s why we put that committee together,” Morrison said. “It was to make a rational decision.”

Fleming said Monday that his phone hasn’t stopped ringing from irate constituents concerned that the Council made a rushed decision in just two days and didn’t even consider thoroughly the TDS proposal. “I can’t talk about it,” he said. “When it all comes out, you’ll see. It wasn’t even close.”

Former City Councilman and Mayoral candidate Paul Alexander, who lost to Morrison, wrote in a letter to the Mayor earlier this week that the Council is sending bad signals to the public by taking only two days to decide to whom to award a “$400 million contract.” In contrast, Alexander wrote, it took months, and seeing presentations from the contestants, to decide a winner for the paltry (in comparison) $350,000 Gateway consulting gig two years ago.

Even though TDS has been thrown out of consideration for now, Morrison said that should contract negotiations bog down with Republic, the City can always invite TDS back in.

“Nothing is set in stone,” Morrison said.

City’s Next Move

Wednesday afternoon, Councilwoman Farmer was unaware of the TDS announcement that the company will be servicing construction sites. But she may have telegraphed how the City will react. Last November, Council narrowly approved allowing TDS trucks to navigate city streets to service that company’s trash and recycling contract with Angelo State University. Farmer said this afternoon that Council’s decision to allow TDS trucks to navigate on city streets to and from ASU may not be the final decision. 

In the meantime, Morrison is anxious to proceed with the contract negotiations with Republic. “We’ve got to get this new contract in place by August 1,” he said.

Gloves are Off, Says TDS

TDS’ Beard said that in the aftermath of the TDS’ loss in the RFP process, “The gloves are off.”

Beard said that he doesn’t believe that anyone at the city fully understands the liabilities that are at the city landfill. “There were seven invited to the RFP process, only two replied, and one was the incumbent,” he said. “Why do you think no one else bid on the RFP? They didn’t want to assume the liability for the landfill.”

“That’s why we felt it was important to be able to make a presentation about our proposal to Council,” Beard said. “Someone doesn’t want the public to hear about it and that’s why there was the abbreviated selection process.”

Republic was contacted via phone locally at 4 p.m. and by email at the corporate level at the same time. We did not hear back from them by email publication time.

Related: San Angelo's Looming Trash Crisis (Nov. 2013)

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

Who didn't see this happening - oh say two years ago - please raise your hand! This should be entertaining (to say the least).
lc76901, Thu, 04/10/2014 - 09:40
For one...how do we the public know that this contract is estimated to cost the city and the public $400 million? There has been no proof of the amount for the public to see, as this as I have read, will not be public information until the contract is finalized. As for TDS hauling for construction sites and offering their services, this is against the city contract for trash disposal. And as all of you have read, they are only allowed to haul from ASU on city streets. Do these companies who are considering this move know how much the additional charge for disposal here at the San Angelo landfill will be? Or does TDS intend to haul every single dumpster clear to Austin? I wonder what the cost of that transportation would be?? Too many questions with not enough answers about TDS! The one funny part that I have heard is how TDS has people who they claim to be from San Angelo working for them, when in fact these men do not live in the city at all, but live in Veribest. So, how can this company keep saying that they have strong connections here in town?? Interesting. Why doesn't TDS give out information on their prices too? And how they charge the people outside city limits for trash disposal? Ok, so they say Republic over charges commercial accounts? Just curious if maybe the commercial companies have maybe over filled their dumpster, or put other objects into these dumpsters that weighed a lot or wasn't meant for landfill dumping? Does TDS know these answers? Come on admit the truth for once and stop blame before you have all the answers!!!
Bill Richardson, Thu, 04/10/2014 - 17:15
You will Find "Texas Disposal Systems, Proposed Solid Waste Contract to City Of San Angelo" presented at the November 5th San Angelo City Council Meeting on my blog @: http://billssanangeloblog.blogspot.com/p/texas-disposal-systems.html Johnny Silvas falsely described "Texas Disposal Systems" a little company unable to do the job. Council members expressed a desire to get "a contract" approved before the May 10, 2014 election. Part of Republic Services proposal is to have exclusive right to recycling in San Angelo. This will put locally owned recycling companies out of business. Today is the due date for Candidate First Reports of Campaign Contributions and Expenditures for the May 10, San Angelo City Council Elections. These reports should be up on the San Angelo City Web Site by tomorrow. Look under City Government, Elections.
I believe competition is good for everyone and a monopoly, especially one created by city government has everyone in handcuffs. Both companies should be transparent and then we would all know the detaills instead of being told in effect "as taxpayers you're not smart enough to know, so we'll let you all know just what WE think you need to know". Now too bad we couldn't get some competition with the water department.
I was wondering why Republic started commercials on Suddenlink cable system, they never have before, at least the way these commercials come across.
SnS, Thu, 04/10/2014 - 17:57
Hmmm. I saw it, Don. San Angelo elected 4 then-current or former City Council members and a retired city employee to the council last cycle (only one FNG), and the good-ole-boy atmosphere just got thicker. Whoda thunkit? Competition is good for the taxpayer; Monopoly is good for the government and the cronies... "Wardlaw, Fleming, Farmer, City Manager Daniel Valenzuela, Assistant City Manager Michael Dane, and City Operations Director Shane Kelton" don't have to worry about an election coming up in a few weeks, either. It's not like it's their money anyway, right?
Bill Richardson, Sat, 04/12/2014 - 09:10
SMD-1 incumbent Rodney Fleming plans on demanding that the City Council shut down the city's car washes at the Tuesday, April 15, 2014 San Angelo City Council Meeting. This issue was discussed and rejected by the previous city council even when we were facing drought level three. Car washes are privately owned and financially support their owners and many employees. Car washes recycle their water and use less water than washing your vehicle at home. Fleming's short sighted demands have had the privately owned RV industry crippled for months. In a recent article in the San Angelo Standard Times Mr. Fleming stated that he was not aware of the consequences of his actions. On the community front Rodney Fleming, in his ignorance of the issues, attacked the SAISD angrily demanding the school district stop watering it's trees. The previous city council had decided that the city parks department should keep watering the city's trees because of the investment of time and money put into cultivating and caring for the city's trees. SAISD was following the city's lead.
Pinko, Sat, 04/12/2014 - 10:52
Bill Richardson, car washes are indeed private businesses owned by individuals who took the risk of operating a company that relies on the usage of water in a region that borders a desert. Governments, whether municipal, state, or federal, exist to protect the public good, not the special interest of a few individuals who made unfortunate business decisions (despite the precedent set by previous bailout debacles). I am not aware of a car wash in the city that has drilled a well to tap into a private water supply. The water security of a community of over 100,000 citizens trumps the few "job creators" who seek to wash our way into desiccation.
Bill Richardson, Sat, 04/12/2014 - 14:18
BD you are correct. My point is that a modern carwash is far more efficient than washing the vehicle at home. As for the self service car wash centers I believe they are still more efficient that the at home automotive garden hose based wash. The modern car wash is an integrate part of the modern economy and we should that the business owners who have invested their capital and expertise to San Angelo. Shutting down the car washes and putting people of business and work is not going to help. The number of vehicle owners who wash their vehicles at home will increase. Mr. Fleming's lack of insight into best business practices, the use and supply of water and long term planning will also affect auto dealerships which wash and detail the used cars they buy to resell. After a year on council Mr. Fleming has not made himself aware of the issues or familiarized himself with past rational and decisions of the council. The Hickory Water Treatment Plant is scheduled to come on line in about four months. We have enough water available to support present usage for fourteen months without the Hickory Water. I see no advantage of damaging the local economy based on Rodney Fleming's inability to rationally understand the present situation and understand long term based planning. Fleming may have stopped watering his front yard but he is still filling his backyard swimming pool.

Post a comment to this article here: