City to Consider Litigation With Republic Over Old Trash Contract

 

The City of San Angelo's Tuesday Council meeting will include a discussion on possible litigation with Republic Services, the City’s current waste disposal and landfill contractor, with whom the City is negotiating a new contract to start Aug. 1.

The Council agenda published on cosatx.us Friday contained the following to be discussed in executive session:

“Section 551.071(1) to consult with attorney on pending or contemplated litigation relating to 1) alleged non-compliance with Agreement for Waste Collection and Disposal and Landfill Lease and Operation between City of San Angelo and Republic Waste Services of Texas effective August 1, 2004 and 2) pending litigation involving one or more water rights owned by the City of San Angelo.

City Public Information Officer Anthony Wilson could not release any further details because the agenda item is slated for the executive session.

At Wednesday's special press conference on the trash controversy, City Manager Daniel Valenzuela praised the working relationship that the City enjoyed with Republic. When asked whether the city manager’s stated opinion expressing a general mood of goodwill and friendship with Republic had changed in the City Manager's mind since Wedmesday, Wilson said “no.”

Texas Disposal Systems President Bob Gregory called the agenda item “very interesting.”

“The topic is so broad that it could refer to litigation involving several different entities with different causes of action. While the City certainly could be looking at litigation against Republic related to their management of the City's landfill or their charging local businesses an estimated millions of dollars in surcharge fees not authorized by City ordinance, the City Manager's supportive statements about Republic at his Wednesday press conference suggest a pep rally to justify the award of a new contract, rather than a serious litigation discussion,” Gregory wrote from his iPhone.

TDS lost the RFP selection to Republic Services.

Republic Services declined to comment on the story, though several attempts were made to contact local officials.

Analysis

Valenzuela’s stated strategy Wednesday was to direct his staff to pave two pathways through the trash controversy up and until the time a decision will need to be made by Council. The first tack is to finish negotiations on the new contract from the RFP selection with Republic, and the second is to fully investigate the suspect Environmental Recovery Fees (ERF), equal to approximately 32% extra on commercial trash collection bills, that Republic has been charging for at least a decade. To date, the City has announced no finding of specific legal authorization for Republic to charge San Angelo's commercial customers the ERF.

Since the 2004 contract is involved in the executive session description, this may be related to the ERF issue. City staff may be poised to offer Council options on how to proceed with the second pathway described above.

Wednesday, the City said the contract negotiations would not be completed in time for the May 6 council meeting.

Valenzuela is distancing himself from being involved in the actual trash decision by assuming the role of researcher and facilitator for Council. Once his staff has completed their negotiations and research, the decision on how to proceed will rest almost completely upon Council’s shoulders.

How much of the fallout of the trash controversy will reach the fourth floor of City Hall is an open question.

Meanwhile, the trash controversy is more political than ever. Council elections are May 10, and it is unlikely that a negotiated contract will be presented to Council for a vote before new Council members are sitting on the dais. How this election turns out could significantly impact the trash decision.

Trinidad Aguirre, who is running against incumbent Councilman Rodney Fleming, has spoken out against the process. Fleming sat on the RFP selection committee and has defended his vote to select Republic. Councilman Johnny Silvas is also up for re-election. Although Silvas voted to approve the selection of Republic and to proceed with negotiations, he has been less outspoken on the RFP process than Fleming. Silvas is facing two opponents who may split his opposition.

Elizabeth Grindstaff is running against an underfunded candidate in retiring Councilman Winkie Wardlaw’s Santa Rita district and hasn’t taken a public position on the RFP process that we are aware.

The irony of the matter is the City is discussing litigation with a vendor at the same time it’s negotiating a long-term, multi-million dollar contract.

In a San Angelo LIVE! poll conducted of a convenience sample of 161 Facebook fans of San Angelo LIVE’s and The San Angelo Connection Friday, sentiment is running strongly against the City’s handling of the trash RFP process by a margin of 85% against to 15% for. We will keep the survey open through Monday morning’s email time, 8 a.m. You can participate in the one-question survey here.

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

seems to me like re-hiring a company that we are currently looking at suing for bad business practices is alot like getting back in bed with a prostitute who gave you an std you just got cured of. just saying
Why would you want to hire a company (TDS),who is ran by a man that was fired from the company he's accusing of things? The fees were done when he was running Trashaway-Republic. The reason he was fired is he was using company funds to make purchases for his vehicles like a new engine for his personal truck. Using maintenance funds to buy parts for other things he owned. He's retaliating for being fired and his company not getting what he wanted.
Bill Richardson, Sat, 05/03/2014 - 13:31
This "law suit" if it every materializes is an attempt by the present city council to protect themselves from the fury of the citizens of San Angelo. The issue is to be discussed in secret (closed session.) Legal council will be City Attorney Lysia Bowling, who is no friend of San Angelo tax payers. The most that will come of this is an out of court settlement which will never be disclosed to the public.

Post a comment to this article here: