Christian Nationalism and Sanctuary Cities

 

OPINION — I live outside the city of San Angelo and can’t vote on the ordinance that would make San Angelo “a Sanctuary City for the Unborn.” Truth be told, at first I wasn’t paying much attention to it, anyway, because I thought it was a symbolic vote that had no real power, unlike the laws passed by the state legislature.

Also, I am personally opposed to abortion (though I do not support government involvement in a decision that should be between a woman and her doctor), so a symbolic act like this still did not bother me. Then two things made me sit up and take notice.

The first occurred last week, when a friend, who lives in another community, had her water break at 17 weeks. She and her husband faced an impossible situation. Because of Texas abortion laws, the doctors were afraid to take the baby, so they were left waiting for the baby, who could not live, to suffocate and die. It was a gut-wrenching experience for all involved.

Second, I read former San Angelo Mayor J. W. Lown’s powerful article explaining that this vote actually does carry enormous power and would do tremendous harm to our community. This ordinance, if it receives a majority, would impose one particular interpretation of scripture on people of various religious beliefs (and those of no religious beliefs). I see such an ordinance as both un-Christian and un-American.

Congresswoman Lauren Boebert (R-CO) recently told worshippers at a religious service, “The church is supposed to direct the government. The government is not supposed to direct the church. That is not how our Founding Fathers intended it.”

She added, “I’m tired of this separation of church and state junk that’s not in the Constitution.”

While it is true that the government is not supposed to direct the church, the idea that the church is supposed to direct the government is not found in any reading of our Founding Fathers.

The Constitution’s only mention of religion is in Article 6: “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

This doesn’t sound like the Founding Fathers wanted the Christian Church or any religion to control government.

She couldn’t have been reading the First Amendment to the Constitution, because it clearly states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

The Founding Fathers were very clear that there was to be no established religion in America. This country was not founded on religion but on reason and the value of all persons (although that has taken many years to flesh out regarding the rights of people of color, women, etc.).

The indisputable truth is that our Founding Fathers were vehemently opposed to any official relationship between church and state, religion and government.

These strict anti-abortion laws in a secular democratic republic violate our constitution and the Bill of Rights. The genius of America is religious freedom for all.

The Jewish faith teaches that life starts with the first breath. Catholic theology teaches that life starts at conception. Historically, Protestants have held to both of these views, while modernday fundamentalists have promoted the Catholic position. As a Baptist minister, I respect all of their interpretations.

But should any religious group have the political power to force their interpretation of scripture on other Americans in a free country?

No, not if we respect the Constitution and the principles on which this nation was founded. I encourage the citizens of San Angelo to defeat this effort – by well-meaning people of faith – to divide us. This is actually the first step to what is happening all over Texas, with the Religious Right trying to take over school boards, city councils, and commissioners courts. Hood County (Granbury) is a prime example, with Ted Cruz’s radical father, Rafael, recently coming to town to endorse three Radical Right candidates for the school board.

San Angelo and Tom Green County has been known as a moderately conservative community that has kept extremes out of our local government. We have a great school board and no crazy book bans. We have a wonderful city council that seems to work for all citizens. Even our county elected officials (all Republicans) seem more interested in serving our community than promoting a right-wing agenda (as Republican state leaders are doing).

American democracy is under threat, and the biggest danger our country faces to remaining a democratic republic comes from Christians who want “the church to direct the government.” If they succeed, America will not survive as a free nation. Christian Nationalism is neither Christian nor patriotic. In reality, it’s evil.

I respect Christians and Jews and Muslims and any religious person holding deep convictions about their faith and about abortion, BUT when they seek to use government to enforce their particular religious beliefs on others, they are destroying the America our Founding Fathers intended when they formed this country.

A Religious Right-controlled America will have no public school system. It will have no freedom for anyone to live out their lives in any way that is different than their narrow definition of family and sexuality. Americans will lose basic civil and human rights, just as citizens in Islamic states.

Government controlled by any religion is a government that no longer guarantees freedom for its citizens, regardless of what religion is doing the controlling. It’s bad for Christianity, and it’s bad for America. I urge you to support the Constitution and the First Amendment, as well as a free faith not intertwined with government.

Please vote NO on the ordinance that would make San Angelo “a Sanctuary City for the Unborn.”

David R. Currie, Ph.D., is a retired Baptist minister, board member of The Interfaith Alliance in Washington, D.C., and a rancher and Sunday School teacher in San Angelo, Texas. He is also former Chair of the Tom Green County Democratic Party.

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

Huh, a preacher that's ok with murdering babies and in west Texas no less. Maybe that's why he's a former preacher?

My money says "in God we trust" so tell me again about that separation. I was really hoping the Fabian socialist Currie had moved away. Sadly, no. 

Christians aren't the only religious group whose beliefs prohibit abortion. Furthermore, there's a secular humanist argument to be made regarding the fundamental regard for human life and the lack thereof that surgically assisted infanticide represents.

If human life is to be taken, and at that the human life of a child by its own mother, simply because it presents an inconvenience to the individuals responsible, then we are already sliding down the slope of decadence into barbarism. Gradually, some less savage nation or nations will overtake countries like ours that allow this practice - and that's already happening.

Not trying to spread baseless disinformation just to further a cause, even though people will subconsciously process and accept a message before their conscious mind has the opportunity to process it...

But gente, maybe Democrat leaders just want to harvest fetuses to raise the Anti-Christ. I mean, they are the government. We don't open the door when the police knock, so why are we trusting the people that make the laws the police enforce? What are Democrat leaders even doing with these fetuses?

Eating them.

 

 

Probably.

albeit falsely, since it's based on nonsense, I opine that Dear Leader Trump's silence regarding the animalistic attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband clearly demonstrates him to be the vile, self-serving sonofawhore I have long known him to be.  He is evil personified.  Were I to believe in an antichrist he would be at the top of my list of candidates

Rightist bilge has helped spawn this depravity, and I truly fear things will only get worse.

 

"animalistic attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband"

???

It was all fun and games doxxing and siccing cancel mobs on political adversaries to impoverish them, threaten their families, attack them physically, and silence them.

Now, suddenly, we're supposed to care when some nut job goes kamikaze? We're supposed to blame Trump, too? Where did you think this was headed?

I tried to talk sense into the Leftists years before Trump was even elected. It didn't go well. Here's the cake you ordered.

Eat it or wear it.

Post a comment to this article here: