Attorney General Ken Paxton made the following statement Sunday and issued an opinion in response to questions about the impact of Obergefell v. Hodges, the case that redefined marriage:
“Friday, the United States Supreme Court again ignored the text and spirit of the Constitution to manufacture a right that simply does not exist. In so doing, the Court weakened itself and weakened the rule of law, but did nothing to weaken our resolve to protect religious liberty and return to democratic self-government in the face of judicial activists attempting to tell us how to live.
“Indeed, for those who respect the rule of law, this lawless ruling presents a fundamental dilemma: A ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court is considered the law of the land, but a judge-made edict that is not based in the law or the Constitution diminishes faith in our system of government and the rule of law.
“Now hundreds of Texas public officials are seeking guidance on how to implement what amounts to a lawless decision by an activist Court while adhering both to their respective faiths and their responsibility to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution. Here is where things currently stand:
“Pursuant to the Court’s flawed ruling, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas issued an injunction against the enforcement of Texas marriage laws that define marriage as one man and one woman and therefore those laws currently are enjoined from being enforced by county clerks and justices of the peace. There is not, however, a court order in place in Texas to issue any particular license whatsoever – only the flawed direction by the U.S. Supreme Court on Constitutionality and applicable state laws.
“Importantly, the reach of the Court’s opinion stops at the door of the First Amendment and our laws protecting religious liberty. Even the flawed majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges acknowledged there are religious liberty protections of which individuals may be able to avail themselves. Our religious liberties find protection in state and federal constitutions and statutes. While they are indisputably our first freedom, we should not let them be our last.”
“In the Attorney General’s opinion my office issued in response to Lt. Governor Patrick’s request for guidance, we find that although it fabricated a new constitutional right in 2015, the Supreme Court did not diminish, overrule, or call into question the First Amendment rights to free exercise of religion that formed the first freedom in the Bill of Rights in 1791. This newly invented federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage should peaceably coexist alongside longstanding constitutional and statutory rights, including the rights to free exercise of religion and speech. This opinion concludes that:
- “County clerks and their employees retain religious freedoms that may allow accommodation of their religious objections to issuing same-sex marriage licenses. The strength of any such claim depends on the particular facts of each case.
- “Justices of the peace and judges similarly retain religious freedoms, and may claim that the government cannot force them to conduct same-sex wedding ceremonies over their religious objections, when other authorized individuals have no objection, because it is not the least restrictive means of the government ensuring the ceremonies occur. The strength of any such claim depends on the particular facts of each case.”
“It is important to note that any clerk who wishes to defend their religious objections and who chooses not to issue licenses may well face litigation and/or a fine. But, numerous lawyers stand ready to assist clerks defending their religious beliefs, in many cases on a pro-bono basis, and I will do everything I can from this office to be a public voice for those standing in defense of their rights.
“Texas must speak with one voice against this lawlessness, and act on multiple levels to further protect religious liberties for all Texans, but most immediately do anything we can to help our County Clerks and public officials who now are forced with defending their religious beliefs against the Court’s ruling.”
To read Attorney General Paxton’s full opinion, click here.
To read Attorney General Paxton’s earlier comments on this Supreme Court ruling, click here.
Comments
Cloaking bigotry behind religious freedom is just plain wrong. This will hurt Texas economically and hit taxpayers defending all the lawsuits. Besides, public officials should resign if they can't follow the laws, including laws adjudicated by the SCOTUS.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkIt's actually cute to see this idiot trying to use his flawed logic to defend his out of place ideals. I agree with Sam up there too. If you cannot do the job you are paid to do, carry on and find a new one.
- Log in or register to post comments
Permalinkit is time to descend on the state capital with pitch forks and torches and demand that abbot and his pal paxton come out of the state building and either leave willingly or be forced out - and be tarred and feathered and driven out on a rail - those guys think that money grows on trees - the state infrastructure is in shambles - we need to spend money on schools roads law enforcement and many other basic services - not on their personal religious beliefs .
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkSo I guess I better hope I'm aligned religiously with the local fire department, or they may decide not to run a call to my heathen home. Or when it comes election time, I better be seen at church or the poll officer may conveniently lose my registration.
These folks that yearn for a nation under "their" god can go join that caliphate a few thousand miles from here. Let us know how that works out for you.
- Log in or register to post comments
Permalink"The religious objections of some deputy clerks and employees can lawfully be accommodated if the accommodation does not result in unequal treatment by the office of gay couples seeking a license. What the Texas attorney general misses is that what is required is not simply the ability of gay couples somehow to obtain a license but the right of those couples to equal treatment by the clerk’s office."
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_breakfast_table/features/2015/scotus_roundup/texas_attorney_general_and_gay_marriage_clerks_must_provide_equal_treatment.html
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkHere it is, just July, and revelations of the AG already ignoring the law. Whats the saying, trading tyrants from 1600 miles away for tyrants, 200 miles away.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkPost a comment to this article here: