SAN ANGELO, TX -- Krystal Nicole Lerma is on trial for burglary of a habitation with the intent to commit another felony for her role in the double homicide on Rio Grande St. in San Angelo in 2016. Testimony in her emotionally charged jury trial began Tuesday morning.
The jury was selected Monday and testimony began after opening statements Tuesday morning by District Attorney Allison Palmer and defense attorney Jimmy Stewart.
Andrew Gonzales and Anthony Martinez were shot multiple times in a home invasion style attack on September 12, 2016. Lerma’s role was laid out before the jury Tuesday in brutal detail including pictures of the bodies of Gonzales and Martinez at the scene.
Palmer’s first witness was Karen Bloss who is a dispatch supervisor for the San Angelo Public Safety Communications Center which takes 911 calls in San Angelo and dispatches police and emergency personnel. Palmer was building her case that officers responded to the scene and the 911 call was recorded accurately.
Next on the stand was home owner Shae McClure who owns a home a few houses down and across the street from the crime scene at 1007 Rio Grande St. McClure testified that he had a video surveillance system with six cameras and he provided San Angelo Police Department investigators with video from the night of September 12, 2016 when the murders took place.
Palmer called seven witnesses in all Tuesday. SAPD officer Brad Howarth was next on the stand. It was during Howarth’s testimony that the jury saw pictures of the bullet riddled and bloody bodies of the victims at the scene.
Bobby Holleman was the neighbor who lived in the other half of the duplex on Rio Grande St. He’s the one who called 911. Palmer played the audio of the 911 call in which Holleman told the dispatcher there was fighting and gunfire at the residence. He told 911 that one of the victims was lying in the front yard bleeding and yelling for help. Holleman told the jury, “I dove to the floor and covered up my head!” when the shooting started. Crime Scene Technicians found a bullet in a wall in Holleman’s side of the duplex.
After Holleman’s testimony, Palmer called SAPD CID Detective Lynn Dye. During his testimony, Palmer showed the jury a video of the crime scene showing blood stains and bullet holes, spent shell casings and other evidence at the scene. Palmer also played the surveillance video from McClure’s home down and across the street which showed a four door pickup drive up with its lights off and park in front of McClure’s home. McClure was not home at the time. The video also shows people exiting the truck and then getting back in the truck about 8 minutes later and driving off.
Then the District Attorney called SAPD CID detective Eddie Chavarria to the stand. Chavarria testified that he obtained a search warrant and downloaded all communications from two cell phones and an IPad found at the scene. That’s when testimony showed that Krystal Lerma’s username on Snapchat was ‘Lilmisspopular.’ She was snapping with ‘Rayalvarado96,’ who was identified as Raymond Alvarado who was convicted of being the only shooter at the crime scene.
Chavarria’s testimony included a conversation on Snapchat between lilmisspopular and rayalvarado96 in which lilmisspopular snaps, “If I do my part, I want a TV.” Rayalvarado96 responds, “IDC (I Don’t Care)” and lilmisspopular responds, “My baby’s broke so I really need one.”
The last witness of the day was SAPD CID Detective Adrian Castro. Castro was one of the investigators who interviewed Lerma on two separate occasions.
It was during Castro’s testimony that the jury heard that Raymond Alvarado was the only one at the crime scene with a gun and that testimony showed Alvarado shot Gonzales and Martinez and in the process shot himself in the hand.
Alvarado was wanted for murder and Castro acquired his phone number. While investigators were waiting on it to ping or locate, he decided to ask permission to just call Alvarado. Castro called Alvarado’s cell, and Alvarado answered. Alvarado told Castro that he would talk to SAPD officer Bobby Elrod because he had a previous relationship with him. Castro got Elrod and Alvarado on the phone where Alvarado admitted to being at the scene and having a gun. That was enough for Castro to ask for a warrant for Alvarado’s arrest.
Alvarado ran and was eventually captured in Michigan.
Palmer the turned to two videotaped interviews with Krystal Lerma. Jurors watched Lerma sit in a chair in the interview room at the San Angelo Police Department for about 15 minutes by herself. Jurors squirmed, looked around and like the rest of us, were wondering what we were watching. Eventually, Detectives entered the room and began questioning Lerma.
That’s when jurors learned Lerma had a relationship with Raymond Alvarado and then had a relationship with Andrew Gonzales. Lerma said during the video that Alvarado wanted to fight Gonzales because of that relationship.
In the first video interview, Lerma denied even being at the scene. Investigators, though had video evidence and witness testimony that she was there. It was during that interview that Lerma told investigators, “Nobody likes me!” She was emotional at the time. She also said, “This makes me sick! I’ll never get over this.” and “I don’t know I honestly don’t know!”
Castro told Lerma in the interview that he had talked to Alvarado. She seemed surprised and said, “That truth should exclude me!” At the end of that interview, Lerma told investigators, “I’m not playing a game! I don’t know what to tell you! I was at home with my kids.”
Lerma told investigators there was no one at home with her who could corroborate her story.
During the second interview, Lerma is visibly different. She looks nervous and scared. She begins the interview by saying, “I’m going to be 100 percent honest with you this time.”
“I’m sorry I wasn’t honest with you guys last time.”
Lerma proceeded to tell this story. “Me and Andrew had sex and stuff but we weren’t serious.” She continued her story laced with the ‘F’ word and said “I talked to Ray once a week.”
Lerma described the night of the murders. She said she was ‘snapping’ with Gonzales and that he was drinking with friends and she wanted some weed. Gonzales asked her to come over to his house. She said she would. Lerma testified that she was wearing ‘bed clothes’ but went to his house to get the weed. She said she got lost, and ended up on the phone with Gonzales as she drove around the back of his residence, down the driveway and parked in front of his house.
Lerma testified that she went inside and Gonzales and Martinez were there. She was embarrassed that Martinez was there because she was wearing bed clothes, which she described in the video as no bra, no pants, only shorts and a t-shirt. She said Gonzales was drunk and kissing her and touching her. She kept saying ‘whatever’ while he got her a small amount of weed from his stash.
Lerma testified that she left and drove around the block and was on the phone with Gonzales and he got her to drive back in front of her house. She went back in for a brief time and then left and that’s when Ray Alvarado pushed his way past her at the front door and went into the house. Lerma’s video testimony then showed that she, “F***ing ran! I was freaking out!”
Testimony showed that Justin Gamez was driving a four door pickup and that Ray Alvarado and Ricky Zuniga were with him. The neighbor, Holleman, testified that he saw a petite woman come out of 1007 Rio Grande and watched as three men pushed past her into the residence. Then he heard gunshots and a short time later found a man bleeding pleading for help in the front yard so he called 911.
The state is expected to rest its case Wednesday morning. Krystal Lerma’s jury trial begins again Wednesday in the Tom Green County Courthouse.
Comments
I guess that's why it's good to have a very small circle of friends. People in the entertainment industry "glorify" the thug life and this situation is what it's really like. I didn't hear mention of meth or any heroin or any of that... Just drinking with buddies and smoking pot... Cop a feel on the chick that's setting you up so she can have a T.V. "Gangster" at it's finest...
I've had my share of "near death" experiences in the streets of San Angelo, years ago... You don't have to be very "deep in the game", to get yourself popped for stupid reason's around here. It all comes down to choice... I choose to stay away from shady people and those saturated in the street or prison mentality.
More dummies have guns, and do drugs in this city, than people think... That's sad too, because I'm only able to say that from personal experiences from years ago... Can't imagine how much the criminal element has grown since then.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkNo one liked her enough to bother teaching her traits like self respect or civility -- hence the braless skank leeching onto a robbery plot to get a TV.
Why should anyone like that?
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkEven Freud recognized the basic human need's of love and acceptance, these drive all of us, although each person does widely different things with those motivations. Teaching someone self-respect and civility is the same as leading a horse to water.
This was just one of the people that chose the "dark" path. I will say this though, people do tend to like those qualities that are attractive in human behavior as opposed to things that are not respectful or civil.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkGreat points Nate. When I suggested that one must first be "likeable", this was in response to her assertion that "no one likes her".
The concepts of "love" or "being liked" are not entitlements. Like respect, they're earned. This maxim is increasingly forgotten today, oddly (or conveniently) enough by those who possess absolutely NO endearing qualities to speak of.
Take a look at the various social justice movements or the perpetually oppressed feminist gaggles. Almost ALL want to stomp around the land with the reckless abandon of a mentally defective child, and then demand that the world see themselves and their poster children as nothing less than noble and virtuous.
Everyone wants love, but not everyone deserves it.
Most people will not look favorably upon a thief or a liar, unless they're cut from the same cloth, and a thief and a liar seldom arrive at the age of 28 with this kind of inflated sense of self worth, without a lifetime of grooming by likeminded peers.
If we're to believe in any form of "rehabilitation", I believe shame should be one of the means to that end. Someone named "lilmisspopular" lamenting the fact that no one likes her isn't going to do the right thing because it's the right thing to do, she may however, rethink her life if a metaphorical mirror is held up for a bit of self reflection:
Most 28 year old American women haven't sunk to the level of wandering around town in their bedclothes, trying to bum a free smoke. Most 28 year old women have their minds on careers and/or family, and the comforts they can afford themselves by means of hard work -- not acquiring the TV of a murder prospect. In addition, you ARE who you screw. Outside of your little bubble of career criminals and low standards, there's an entire world who doesn't LIKE YOU.
Living the lifestyle is easy. Owning the fallout is painful.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkIt is especially difficult to love the unlovable. I agree with much of your points, self-ism seems to be the popular norm that does the self worth inflating.
I think that under the proper circumstances... shame can teach people things that words from another can't. I don't think that shame is a good thing if inescapable... people won't change if they don't get the opportunity to live down the shame... but that's just what I think.
Your last statement is true... Anyone can abandon caring, loving, and respecting themselves and others around them, wander the streets in search of multiple forms of "fixes", but not everyone can handle the consequences of those choices. I don't believe in Karma, but I do believe that whatever you sow today, you will have to harvest tomorrow.
One of the most beautiful things in life is when, love is given freely without the recipient having done anything to earn it. That kind of love changes some folks... But I'm not disillusioned, not everyone will be changed by it. I think on some level, we all know when the downtrodden man needs a hand, and I also know, that not everyone you may want to help, will actually be helped by your interventions.
This was a great representation of how many folks use their social media outlets to portray themselves as having what they truly lack... I don't do FB or any of the others, but when I did in the past, I noticed that many, felt like painting a prettier picture of ourselves than was there to be painted. But hey, if someone has the platform, sling the chosen media across the canvas, I'm not stopping em'.
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkHow you respond as an individual, to discrimination or unfair treatment of any kind, has everything to do with how you overcome the slight. You can look at the difference in reaction between Jew's, "who have been the subject of every kind of atrocity as far back as you want to look", and Black's who have only a short, "several hundred years", history with atrocities from slavery and racism.
I can't recall violent Jewish protests, or militant mobs, do you? The numbers are all wonky, but from what I can tell, relatively close to the same number of Black's were killed, or died, in the slave trade, as Jew's in the holocaust.
People can argue whatever point they want, I just know that to seek vengeance in various forms for slavery, doesn't seem to be the formula for successfully bringing about the change you want to see. I do agree that the scars left from both of these examples still have a ripple effect on people all over, to deny they happened is an injustice, but I don't think Jew's would agree that, white privilege is what caused their atrocities.
We have to forgive, in order to overcome... The type's of racial discrimination are widely different today, than they were 300 years ago, 200 years ago, and even 100 years ago. I think if we are honest, the fighting that we did as American's, to damage slavery and racism, has been as effective as humanly possible, up to this point... We do have farther to go.
If we are equal in the law books, there's no reason discrimination of any kind can't be fought... There are still people who care, and love their fellow man, that's why the whole white privilege thing needs some clarification.
This article deals with the issues and set's some clear defining lines on the topic... Read if you like.
Have a good day RR.
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/more-than-mere-equality/
- Log in or register to post comments
PermalinkPost a comment to this article here: