Appeals Court Agrees to Allow Republic Service’s Monopoly in San Angelo, Even for Construction Trash

 

SAN ANGELO, TX — Republic Services was awarded an exclusive trash collection contract within the city limits of San Angelo in July 2014. Since then, the vanquished opponent of that contract contest, Texas Disposal Systems, has been nipping at Republic’s heels.

One way TDS has stuck into Republic’s crawl is by using a little-known statute in State of Texas code that TDS argues allows TDS to service construction job sites with temporary roll-off trash collection within the city limits, regardless of the exclusive contract.

Republic sued TDS in Oct. 2014 in Federal District Court, and, after a court fight that spanned nearly a year, TDS won a judgment from Judge Sam R. Cummings that allowed TDS to continue to offer competition in the local temporary roll-off trash collection market in San Angelo. Cummings dismissed Republic’s lawsuit and denied a motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Republic asked of the court.

Republic appealed the decision to the U.S. 5th Circuit of Appeals. Last Thursday, that court ruled in favor of Republic’s appeal, vacating the lower court’s ruling. Now, the two trash providers will go back to district court and start the fight all over again.

Since April 2014 when the City of San Angelo chose Republic to be the monopoly trash hauler within the city, TDS has competed with Republic for the business of area building contractors. The competition has kept construction trash pickup prices for area contractors low.

Low prices for commercial trash pickup is not a characteristic in San Angelo’s trash pickup monopoly given Republic. At least it is expensive for businesses other than contractors since the exclusivity contract was inked, TDS and many business owners have argued. Republic hiked commercial rates, TDS said, about 72 percent with the 2014 exclusivity contract. Some restaurants complained their trash pickup prices were hiked as much as 94 percent.

TDS previously won in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, arguing that state law trumps city ordinance, and the city had no business granting Republic exclusivity for temporary roll-off trash service. Specifically, TDS argued “that Section 364.034(h) of the Code [in Texas statutes] precluded the City from entering into exclusive contracts for temporary construction solid waste disposal services,” and won.

The lower court opinion in favor of TDS was overruled by the appeals court last Thursday.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling against TDS does not immediately preclude TDS from continuing its temporary roll-off business yet. It only remanded the case back to a lower court for a hearing and decision.

“The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion,” the ruling states.

Republic’s next move may be to argue for an injunction to have TDS cease temporary roll-off trash collection inside the San Angelo city limits until the case is settled.

More on the case:

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

Of course, this will anger some, but nobody should be surprised by the "buddy system" Dwain Morrison has with this company. You'll argue that it was decided in court, and we will all make fun of you because any justice system around this area is a joke. It's all political and you gotta be in with the wealthy or popular to get a damn thing done!

The fact that the court supported maintaining a monopoly instead of allowing competition speaks volumes about the hypocrisy of those that claim that they support businesses and then use the courts to suppress competitors. You can't have it both ways. You are either for free enterprise or you are for a monopoly.

Instead of "justice" there is "just us". Republic wants it to be "just us" instead of supporting fair competition.

It goes without saying that the courts are packed with judges that are beholding to large corporations such as Republic for one reason or another.

Does the name of the company rhyme with the name of a party? Which one was that? The one that is all for free enterprise and the small guy? The one that will bring back all the jobs? I forgot.

Post a comment to this article here: