San Angelo Subdivision Developers Say the Fire Marshal is Harming Economic Progress

 

While the residential real estate market in San Angelo thrives, there is for the first time in many years a need for more than a street or two of new home development.

To meet the demand, several new housing developments have sprung up over the past couple of years.

Now, some land developers are saying that the City of San Angelo Fire Marshal, Ross Coleman, is overzealous, enforcing City code requiring that these new subdivisions have a second access road into them—some built out into former dry ranchland. That will drive up costs, and in some cases, shut down development, they contend.

Land developers complain that the wording of the Ordinance leaves too much up to interpretation by the Fire Marshal, forcing developers to endure unwanted extra capital outlays, driving up the cost of lots and housing in San Angelo.

The Ordinance, Section 503.1.2, which Coleman is enforcing, is derived from the International Fire Code, said Assistant Chief of Operations Scott Farris. The Chief wants to find a reasonable compromise. Tuesday, Mayor Dwain Morrison requested that the entire issue be placed on the Council agenda for discussion and possible action.

David Darnell and partner Michael Mees are developing two housing developments to the west of Southland off Twin Mountain Drive. One subdivision, for higher-end homes, is called Saddle Club. Phase I of that development features 47 lots. The other, for more modestly priced homes, is called Baker’s Ranch with 31 lots.

Both developments are affected by the Ordinance because they each have more than 30 lots.

In the past, Darnell said, the City would allow subdivisions sized over 30 lots to not initially have an extra access road if there were future plans and subdivision plats to show that the next additions will incorporate the additional access.

Adding the access road, that Darnell said was nothing more than a graded caliche road through adjoining property that he doesn’t own yet, will add an additional $3,000 to $4,000 to the price of each lot sold. Saddle Club lots, at $43,000 each and up, are already high enough, Darnell said. Baker’s Ranch is in the $31,000 to $34,000 range.

San Angelo Home Builders Assoc. Executive Director Lynsey Flage said that the way the Ordinance is being interpreted today has more ramifications than just added cost to the homebuyer. It can shut down additional home building in existing developments that do not physically have an economical way yet to incorporate the extra access roads. That’s what will happen to Butler Farms, she said.

Chief Farris countered that there is never any guarantee that the housing market will remain as strong as it is today, and the additional development and the promised second access road may never be built. He said to ensure the safety of the residents in those new developments he wants two ways in and out from the start.

Land developers, the Mayor, Councilman Rodney Fleming, city officials, and Chief Farris met last Thursday afternoon and attempted to hammer out a compromise. “Some said we’re getting close to a deal,” Chief Farris said. “But I am not too sure of that yet.”

On the City Council agenda Tuesday is “Discussion and consideration of possible options on matters related to amending Appendix D regarding Fire Apparatus access roads of the International Fire Code and Section 503.1.2 Additional Access, related Code sections, and any action in connection thereto).”

Update 2:56 p.m.

Assistant City Manager Michael Dane said: "I am in favor of bringing stakeholders together to work on solutions.  We coordinated two meetings last week in an effort to develop a compromise that Council could approve.  I believe we made progress."

---

Correction:

In the original article, I attributed the San Angelo Fire Dept. side as coming from Chief Brian Dunn. That was my error. I was actually talking to Asst. Chief of Operations Scott Farris over the phone. The quote attribution to Dunn has been changed to Farris.

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

I'm sure there's no plausible rationale for having multiple routes to a burning building. Nope, must just be the Fire Marshall being a jerk. I can't help but wonder if the builders bothered to read the ordinances before they decided to build. The secondary ingress should have been part of planning from the beginning, I would think.
The International Fire Code that the Fire Marshall is guide that almost all cities use to enforce fire codes. Fort Worth a city about 10 times that of San Angelo to the best of my knowledge would like a secondary road in a development but accepts that it is always not possible. Didn't Bentwood open a second exit road on the access of Loop 302? Was this a requirement of the Fire Marshall? I know that the housing area called Butler Farms does not and if required by the Fire Marshall the cost would be excessive. Sometimes people who enforce laws and ordinances are a little over zealous with power..
Compromising safety in this instance is ridiculous. What happens when EMS personnel are blocked from an area and someone dies? Is the city prepared for that lawsuit? It will be much more expensive than any loss of income from delayed development.
I agree with Big Daddy! The almighty dollar in place of what the right thing to do is going to hurt dearly in the future. Do it right the first time and most likely it will cost less than in the future. Having more than one access route to a burning facility enables first responders to reroute second alarm equipment if the primary route is blocked by extra traffic and equipment already in place. I can just see the headlines in the newspaper and on TV news, "House fire in Saddle Club or Baker's Ranch subdivisions, residents angry about fire department slow in rescuing trapped child and putting out fire."
So, are the council members who are involved in the real estate and construction industries in San Angelo going to recuse themselves? It would seem more than a little suspect if council members vote on an issue which will have direct financial benefit for them. Of course, they ARE politicians, so I guess corruption is to be expected. This is a pretty brazen example though. We should expect better from our elected officials than to place their own financial investments above the safety of the public they were elected to serve. How about the council members move into the homes in the furthest reaches of the subdivision, place their loved ones and most prized possessions inside, pile dry brush up against the foundations, and THEN revisit whether they want secondary access?
Bill Richardson, Mon, 04/14/2014 - 15:43
I totally support City of San Angelo Fire Marshal Ross Coleman on this issue. I thank him for standing up for the rule of law.
To all of you in the building industry and those involved with them, shame on you for trying to push your agenda in the media while trying to make Mr. Coleman look like a jerk. You look like bigger jerks for playing your political games. Mr. Coleman is trying to do his job to the best of his ability by following city ordinance, which he had no part of creating. You are vilifying him in the media; however, if Mr. Coleman gave in and someone died because emergency responders couldn't get to a certain location not one of you would stand behind him. You would all turn your backs on him so fast it would look like a mass exit. He would be standing alone while you shouted to have him fired. Let's face it, you guys couldn't care less about anything but lining your wallets with wealth. You couldn't care less about the expense because you would pass it onto other individuals. In the grand scheme of things $3000 or $4000 spread over 20 or 30 years doesn't amount to a huge expense. If they cannot afford that extra $3k or $4k they probably shouldn't be looking in those neighborhoods. Their piece of mind at having an extra route of ingress and egress should far out way that expense. I would rather pay for extra roads than the flood insurance I have to pay every month for as long as I own my home (when I can't even water my yard) but that's not realty. Just because Mr. Coleman hasn't climbed into bed with you and you cannot control him like a puppet you are trying him in a court of public opinion.
Ask the people of Cross Plains if an escape route is really necessary. Believe it not a wildfire can spread through residential areas.
C269, Tue, 04/15/2014 - 06:27
The building codes are written as a package that work together to attempt to provide a certain level of safety to the occupants of the buildings. Picking the codes apart or only enforcing part of the code invalidates the whole thing. These codes were not created at random by some nose picker. They are the result of research and more importantly past disasters. That's right, many building codes are a direct response to something bad happening and people dying. Dramatic statements aside... this is fact. To not enforce the code so a contractor can make a few extra dollars is just wrong. Bid Daddy had it right!
For those of you who have shared your support of Mr. Coleman's enforcement of the fire codes, please share those thoughts with City Council. I am sitting here today watching the council meeting and am in shock. There are more people at the meeting than I have ever seen before. The people there are in support of crucifying Mr. Coleman, the city code and such. There are very few people there sharing the same sentiments that you all have shared her. So much of what is going on with this is due to politics by our illustrious council members as well as the builders who are padding their pockets. The fire code is put in place to protect the community. That is what the city officials are here for - to protect us. Some of our council members are afraid that if Mr. Coleman is allowed to enforce the code that they may not be re-elected since their constituents will not be getting their way. I heard a builder say today that this is a risky business. I would like to see how they would handle the risk of trying to save the lives of others when they couldn't get in or out. Please please please - if you agree with Mr. Coleman's desire to do what is right, let your council representative know. And be sure to copy the mayor, the state fire marshall and even the media with your concerns - it's the only way to protect our community and to have the right thing be done!

Post a comment to this article here: