San Angelo Police and City of San Angelo in Temporary Deadlock Over Raises

 

SAN ANGELO, TX – On August 25, 2016, City of San Angelo officials and employees, including representatives from the San Angelo Police Department, met for the first 2016 Meet & Confer.

At that time, SAPD, and all other City employees, learned that raises would not be forthcoming because of current budget shortfalls.

SAPD, however, is the only City department under contract, and employees were told they would get raises in October of 2016, as they did in 2015, per the previous Meet & Confer agreement.

Lisa Marley, director of Human Resources and Civil Service for COSA, said, because of the budget shortfall, City Team members of Meet & Confer feel the focus of the allocated funds for pay increases of $323,000 should go to insurance premiums.

Given the issues facing the San Angelo Police Department, especially with the current crime rate, eight SACOP members were not in agreement with this decision and attempted to come up with a resolution for today’s second Meet & Confer Meeting held at City Hall, 72 W. College. SACOP members introduced a plan that would eliminate programs that they feel don’t financially benefit SAPD, and by doing so, the funds for those programs could go to officer raises.

SACOP’s proposal, however, was denied, leaving both the City and SAPD in a temporary deadlock until Tuesday’s City Council meeting, where both sides can present their arguments for and against the proposed resolution.

The Primary Issue of Pay Raises

In the previous Meet & Confer Meeting, Marley explained how there were inadequate funds to fulfill the previously discussed pay raises for SAPD.  Pay raises are reliant on sales tax and hotel tax performance, but the current figures did not meet expectations. This revenue fell short by $2 million, leaving only an excess of about $323,000.

In previous budget sessions with City Council, Marley was passionate about closing the income gap between the highest paid city employees and the lowest paid, and getting the City at a 95 percent competitive living wage based on 13 comparable cities in Texas the size of San Angelo. Unfortunately, the current budget shortfall has put that goal on hold.

On the other side of the coin, SACOP members fee pay raises should have been built into the budget, rather than part of sales tax revenue excess. Also, they feel (despite a clause that says the city does not have to honor a contract if it cannot pay its debts) the decision not to honor the raises for officers is a “breach in contract.”

The Amended Meet & Confer Agreement

At today’s meeting, SACOP members brought in an amended proposal that was reviewed and ratified by its members.

One of the eight members told Marley and the other five City team members that SAPD wanted to remove the assessment center mandated by the City previously for sergeant and lieutenant promotions.

“It’s a waste of time,” said one SACOP member. “We’ve done it a total of eight times, and it does nothing. It’s a waste of money.”

The cost for this assessment center is approximately $10,000, and is currently allocated in the SAPD budget.

SACOP members also said they would eliminate the Physical Fitness Program required for officers. Members said officers work out anyway, and that should be voluntary and at the discretion of the individual.

In another section of the amendment, SACOP members proposed replacing the methodology described in the Base Agreement in determining the rate of increase to the steps of each grade, and “shall be in lieu of bringing officers’ pay to 95 percent of the midpoint average total of the 13 selected comparable cities” described in the agreement.

That raise would be approximately 3 percent for higher ranking officers, and about 7 percent for the others.

With this amendment, SAPD officers would be able to use current SAPD allocated funds, but move it around to meet the raises of the officers.

The City’s Decision

For almost an hour, the City debated the amendment provided by SACOP. Marley told the SACOP members that the City will not support the amendment, and they feel the City Council won’t support it either.

Marley said she has three goals outlined by the Council:

  • Come to a solution accepted by SACOP
  • Address health insurance concerns
  • Provide salary increases for general employees

Marley stated pay increases should be delayed until April 2017 so as to benefit all employee raises.

However, she did tell SACOP members that there will be two items on Tuesday’s City Council meeting agenda, and SACOP will have an opportunity to present their case at that time; however, they cannot speak to council members beforehand. Marley also assured SACOP she and the other City team members will present their side.

“We will bring the HR side to council and what the options are,” said Marley. “We’ll recommend the money to go to insurance premiums.”

Overall, something has to be decided by Sept. 30.

SACOP Response to Denial

After Marley and the other team members explained their denial, Sgt. Doug Thomas with SAPD said, “I’m disappointed. I don’t understand.”

He added that SACOP tried to work the numbers for something the City would approve.

After the meeting adjourned, Sgt. Rick Tinsley spoke out on behalf of SAPD.

“We’re obviously disappointed,” he said.

He added that they were presented a problem at the last meeting, so they did their part to come up with an amendment. Tinsley said many officers are not in this job for the money, but with what they face with daily, they did expect a little more from City leaders.

“Some of them (officers) are going to be pretty angry,” said Tinsley.

Tinsley also said SAPD members met all their obligations of the Meet & Confer contract. SAPD still suffers a competitive salary edge to the 13 comparable cities, and Tinsley said, “If we stay where we are, we’ll fall further behind.”

Tinsley said there are some officers who will stay no matter what, but there are other officers who simply want to be that, and they will do so in another city if there are better opportunities.

In a LIVE! interview last week, Chief Frank Carter said there were still 12 – 13 vacancies left to fill, even after the recent graduation of officers, and a lack of raises may negatively affect that.

“As a supervisor, I’m going to have some work to do,” Tinsley said about talking to employees, and about helping prepare SAPD’s case for Tuesday’s City Council meeting.

“I was hoping for more support,” said Tinsley. He added that although SACOP members and SAPD officials cannot talk to council members, hopefully citizens of San Angelo will come forward and do so since they have always supported SAPD.

A Difficult Decision

In her final comments, Marley said City members were surprised by the proposal because SAPD members were told at the last meeting what to do, and this proposal is contrary to what City Council wants.

“The two things that were part of their amendment were management related items from the contract,” Marley said.

She said at this time, the contract is whole, and they’re trying to resolve the issue of funding for salary. That doesn’t mean they can’t go into the contract and review items, but these items “weren’t really theirs to give up,” said Marley.

“This wasn’t the appropriate time to bring those forward,” Marley added.

She said she understands SACOP’s frustration, but the goal is to get to a salary resolution for all employees.

“All 900 of our employees were requesting pay raises for this year,” Marley noted. “None of the other ones are going to get a raise.”

She said everyone is disappointed they’re not getting a raise.

“Our hope was to have the contract be delayed until next April to give pay raises,” Marley said. This would allow the City to work out better funding options.

Offsetting the insurance premiums with the current funds will help affect a greater group of people, Marley said.

She added that an April deadline would work, and City members will need approval from council. 

Marley stated she hopes the budget shortfall is a temporary issue, but the City Council is committed to getting all city employees within 95 percent level salary range. Currently, city employees sit at 88 to 91 percent, while SAPD is at 91.75 percent.

“We do have a long way to go for all employment levels,” said Marley.

Both Sgt. Tinsley and Marley said they plan on presenting their side of the argument to the best of their ability at Tuesday’s City Council meeting held at the McNease Convention Center.

Subscribe to the LIVE! Daily

The LIVE! Daily is the "newspaper to your email" for San Angelo. Each content-packed edition has weather, the popular Top of the Email opinion and rumor mill column, news around the state of Texas, news around west Texas, the latest news stories from San Angelo LIVE!, events, and the most recent obituaries. The bottom of the email contains the most recent rants and comments. The LIVE! daily is emailed 5 days per week. On Sundays, subscribers receive the West Texas Real Estate LIVE! email.

Required

Most Recent Videos

Comments

City officials have blown it for citizens and spent their money foolishly. The garbage contract is a prime example. We need to start cleaning house, starting with the city council, but not stopping there. We need the police! And the contract for raises was broken? Deplorable! If one of us broke a contract with the city, we'd be prosecuted in court!

Sounds to me like do as we (Marley) says or else. The issue at hand was not all city employees, it was police and not meeting the contract. $323,000 doesn't go very far between 600+ people. It's smoke and mirrors. Marley playing the "I'm for the people" card and giving them a few bucks a month. Yeah that is really helping. But all your doing is giving $30 a month to people while simultaneously saying screw you to anyone who wants to try and negotiate pays with the city. And the city will continue to do whatever the heck they want to the detriment of everyone. This is not just a police pay issue, this is a city management/council not taking care of its city and squandering what revenue they have. Not one of our vital infrastructures are taken care of why would police and fire be any different.

Sounds to me like the PD needs to start working on a "work your worth" basis.......if they don't want to pay our PD what they deserve, then maybe the PD should do a little less. Take more time off, stay home with your families, etc. Yes, I'm aware of what the downfall would be; but maybe it will open some eyes and make SOME people learn to appreciate what our awesome SAPD does for this community!

Sounds to me like what needs to happen is that the Meet and Confer group needs to hire an outside auditor team. I can assure you with our streets, infrastructure, pay scale and now broken contracts being in the condition they are in and San Angelo being something like the second highest taxed city in the entire State of Texas, (SOMEBODY or SOMEBODIES) on the inside has a much better income than what is displayed on their pay stubs..........

I also think that since these retards that run the city are so adept at finding loopholes to break contracts, how about breaking the contract with Republic trash services so that we can get one that is interested in providing convenient and affordable services to the community ?

Post a comment to this article here:

X Close